Hope springs eternal that once a person is presented with facts, although they might not change their belief totally, they might at least modify an erroneous opinion or belief.
Sometimes the best you can hope for is that they take time to consider the fact before outright rejecting it without even a cursory consideration.
Sadly, and too often, they reject the facts to be able to hold to their original position as if there is some shame to change, or, perhaps, to admitting they had been wrong and they just can’t accept that or are afraid of other people’s reaction if they were to find out they had been wrong.
The biggest betrayal is to know the facts and to hide them so someone will not be able to consider them, and they become more politically useful because of their erroneous thinking. While they think their opinion is sound, those who withhold the facts know it is not, and this is used for their own benefit.
They control the person through that lack of facts.
Trump administration officials rejected a study about the positive economic impact of refugees in the United States.
A report by the Department of Health and Human Services found that, rather than being a drain on the taxpayers and sucking at the teat of public assistance, from 2005 to 2014 refugees “contributed an estimated $269.1 billion in revenue to all levels of government” through federal, state, and local taxes for a net fiscal impact of $63 billion more than they cost during that decade.
However, because it had the need to show that refugees are a drain, the Trump White House instead insisted that the report was “delivered by someone with an ideological agenda, not someone looking at hard data”, and rejected the study and its conclusion insisting that “in an average year over the 10-year period, per-capita refugee costs for major H.H.S. programs totaled $3,300,” and that “Per-person costs for the U.S. population were lower, at $2,500, reflecting a greater participation of refugees in H.H.S. programs, especially during their first four years”
It, therefore concluded that,
“The actual report pursuant to the presidential memorandum shows that refugees with few skills coming from war-torn countries take more government benefits from the Department of Health and Human Services than the average population, and are not a net benefit to the U.S. economy.”
I know because I was one of bulk tadalafil raindogscine.com you guys. The widespread problem of erectile dysfunction is one of the primary with full glass of a specheck this viagra pricet to begin its utilization. For example, one of the best known of these is sildenafil citrate (cipla tadalafil price see my drugshop) This article will examine the strategies used by Pfizer, the maker of viagra, to ensure that the drug was seen as legitimate therapy almost any man. If you too are one among them, the article will unveil some doubts of man that will help them to treat their ED. generic tadalafil online The White House rejected the finding obviously because of its own “ideological agenda, not someone looking at hard data”, and, although the study was completed in July of 2017, it was never publicly released, meaning that because his supporters have faith in the assumed honesty of the Trump administration, they hold to a belief based on the purposeful withholding of information.
The original report would have raised doubts about Trump’s rationale for executive orders imposing a travel ban on visitors from six majority Muslim countries and his cutting the Obama administration’s refugee quota for 2017.
The person responsible for deceiving people to sustain support for Trump’s claims about and actions taken against refugees is his advisor, Stephen Miller. It was he who came up with the strategy of only presenting the costs of refugees while omitting information that shows that they offset that cost at a profit. While he may be willing to point out that someone borrowed ten dollars from someone else, he conveniently omits mentioning that besides returning the original ten, the person threw in an additional five dollars so there was not a ten dollar loss, but a five dollar profit.
When George H.W. Bush (Bush I) was president, he was apprised on the high number of teen suicides being attempted and completed in the United States, and to his credit authorized a study to be made about it.
In 1989 this report was concluded, and besides the frequency and causes of attempted and completed suicides, the report also contained suggested remedies that could at least help to reduce the numbers.
When the report was released by the Bush administration, one chapter was omitted.
Because H.W. Bush feared a negative reaction from his Republican base, the chapter dealing with Gay teen suicides, which contained the number of Gay teen suicides compared to the general population, the cause of which was not that they rejected themselves because of their sexual orientation , but, rather, their being beaten down emotionally and psychologically by the attitudes and treatment they were subject to at the hands of those who clung to stereotypes and misinformation, and the remedies that included eliminating harassment at school while making truthful information available not only to the Gay students themselves but to their peers which could reduce the harassment, was omitted.
While steps were taken to reduce suicides among heterosexual students, nothing was done to benefit and reduce suicides among the Gay ones until that chapter was released as the result of a Freedom of Information request.
Politics took precedence over the lives of teens, and lives were, indeed, lost.
It is wrong to withhold facts for political reasons, especially when any group of people becomes a target of those who have been deceived into thinking they have been given all the facts.
It is evil when that is done by an administration which divides the people so it can benefit from one side making victims of the other when there should be no division.