These are two historical people whose successors attempted to wipe them out of the history books.

One was a woman and not what had been traditionally in charge of the country; the other, one who did not kow-tow to the religious leaders who wanted their way to be the only way.

Hatshepsut was the fifth pharaoh of the Eighteenth dynasty of Egypt who came to the throne in 1478 BC. When Hatshepsut was 20 years old she became king by employing shrewd strategies outgunning supporters of the person originally destined for the throne.

She left her country better than she found it. She did everything right, and there was prosperity. Some accused her of giving too much of that wealth away.

But, a woman who has succeeded is automatically distrusted as a conniving, scheming seductress who foolishly brings down the men around her.

She was a job grower interested in spreading wealth and creating more opportunities for people so they could have their own income. The amount of wealth she created and redirected back to those who produced it was impressive.

Few people could understand how to justify a female king. Yet she was a careful thinker politically and she was a very good communicator.

Distrust of strong female leaders caused Hatshepsut’s reign and accomplishments to be virtually erased from history.

All statues of her and her cartouches were removed from any place they appeared because of the self-promotion of her successor, Amenhotep II, whose position in the royal lineage was not so strong as to assure his elevation to pharaoh. He also usurped many of Hatshepsut’s accomplishments during his own reign, but erasures were sporadic and haphazard.

One of http://www.devensec.com/news/CMMCP_Notice_AUG_2017.pdf viagra from canada pharmacy the strongest causes to erectile dysfunction is diabetes, and it is not surprising that men that have trouble getting or maintaining an erection are customers for anti ED medicines. Price ranges of prescriptions from these nations can be up to 80% less than charges for the same medicines than Americans because the Canadian government stipulates a price ceiling which the medicine manufacturers are bound to adhere while handing the drugs over to the distributors. sildenafil online Furniture stores such as Storehouse Furniture in Atlanta have pared their selections to an everything goes with everything else array. buying tadalafil tablets If you are experiencing any of the above problems, you are in need of some good advice about how to properly prepare for the test. generic cialis The deliberate erasures or mutilations of the numerous public celebrations of her accomplishments would be all that was necessary to obscure Hatshepsut’s accomplishments.

Hatshepsut’s crime need not be anything more than the fact that she was a woman.  Her successor may have considered the possibility that the example of a successful female king in Egyptian history could demonstrate that a woman was as capable at governing Egypt as a traditional male king, which could persuade future generations of potentially strong females to become kings, and for women to not simply accept their traditional place as she had demonstrated that women were as capable as men to successfully preside over a prosperous Egypt .

The erasure of Hatshepsut’s name almost caused her to disappear from Egypt’s archaeological and written records.

Now reread the above changing the king’s name to Obama, and all the female references to Black, and the “she”s to “he”s.

Then there’s Akhenaten, noted for abandoning traditional Egyptian polytheism and introducing worship centered on the Aten. He tried to shift his culture from Egypt’s traditional religion, but the shifts were not widely accepted. After his death, his monuments were dismantled and hidden, his statues were destroyed, and his name excluded from the king lists because those who benefited from the monetary benefits and power of the traditional religion were angry that he had tried to change things.

He was considered the enemy and a criminal in archival records.

Akhenaten was erased from the official lists of pharaohs as part of an attempt to delete all traces of Atenism and the pharaohs associated with it from the historical record until the late 19th century when his identity was re-discovered and the surviving traces of his reign were unearthed by archaeologists.

He was ‘disappeared” by the religious and any of his reforms expunged by conservatives who did not like any challenges to their religious dominance.

The attempt to erase both Hatshepsut and Akhenaten was perpetrated by their insecure successors who felt it necessary to bolster their reigns by undoing anything their predecessors had done.

Sound familiar?