Poor John Boehner just can’t catch a break.

When President Obama proposed the Affordable Care act that incorporated what had been proposed by the Heritage Foundation in 1989 and the Republicans in 1993, he was told the GOP would not support it if it contained the Individual Mandate that the earlier conservative plan contained, so he took it out.

The Act passed, and John Boehner was in charge of the House that would vote at least 50 times to repeal what the GOP had wanted until they got it.

If they couldn’t get the whole thing repealed, maybe the GOP could delay part of it. So after demanding the section about the employer mandate, and because the president wouldn’t just do away with the ACA, the GOP shut down the government until it became an embarrassment to have done so.

President Obama eventually delayed the employer mandate, and John Boehner instituted a law suit against the president for having done what the GOP had demanded, except he did it without them.
Soon after this the children coming over the border from Central America had gotten out of control, and, in spite of the need for the House to do something nothing was done, and John Boehner said the president could handle it on his own without the involvement of congress.

Congress went on vacation, the president said he would have to do something about this immigration problem on his own by executive order, and Mr. Boehner is now all upset that the president will be doing it on his own.

With all the events going on in Iraq with ISIS and the need to do something to help those people isolated on a mountain and being massacred by them, politicians have demanded something needed to be done, and so the president ordered airstrikes and humanitarian air drops.

“The president’s authorization of airstrikes is appropriate,” Boehner said, “but like many Americans, I am dismayed by the ongoing absence of a strategy for countering the grave threat ISIS poses to the region. Vital national interests are at stake, yet the White House has remained disengaged despite warnings from Iraqi leaders, Congress, and even members of its own administration. Such parochial thinking only emboldens the enemy and squanders the sacrifices Americans have made. The president needs a long-term strategy – one that defines success as completing our mission, not keeping political promises – and he needs to build the public and congressional support to sustain it. If the president is willing to put forward such a strategy, I am ready to listen and work with him.”

The United States is war wary, and many people know that if Maliki had allowed residual troops to have remained with certain protections so they could do their job, and had had a coalition government instead of locking people out of participation, ISIS would not first have had a complaint, and second the freedom to act on that complaint.

on line viagra PREVENTIVE MEASURE One must insure complete avoidance of certain products which would lead to on a negative side. Some of the most prescribed pills are Kamagra, tadalafil cheap robertrobb.com, Caverta and Silagra. Even a single dose of Kamagra can do cialis tab magic to your sexual act and you can achieve harder, longer and thicker erection for satisfactory sexual intimacy. The individual experiencing mental clutters might neglect to satisfy the requirements of his social life and might flounder amid ordinary course of every day schedule. buy viagra pills And, as the objective of being there was to help establish and support a sovereign nation, it would have been a violation of that to ignore the sovereignty of Iraq and force them to allow us to stay.

Obviously Maliki had an unrealistic image of his own reality.

So withdrawing in 2011 according to the timetable established by President Bush, and the missteps of Maliki were not the mistakes of Obama, but his honoring the strategy of a Republican president who must have had an exit strategy as we followed it as designed, and respecting a country’s sovereignty according to that plan.

Boehner meanwhile, while not offering a plan, demands that there be one.

But judging from past actions, no matter what plan is offered, the president would most likely get nothing more than opposition, obstruction, and blame for the result of that obstruction.

Even now, as the president has authorized airstrikes with no boots on the ground, and humanitarian air drops, the Speaker cannot say it is a beginning that needs to be assessed, he merely calls it a non-plan.

The only alternative plan that could be put into action is sending troops back.

I for one, and I did not agree with our being there in the first place, feel that we did what we set out to do, and just because Iraq enjoyed our troops doing their work with Maliki not doing what he should have done, we should not send troops back to die because of someone else’s foolish actions after our hard work.

Obviously Boehner seems to want boots on the ground so h can complain about that.

His insincerity is clear when it is remembered that the night before the airstrikes began there was a White House meeting for the leaders of the House and Senate, and, although invited, Boehner was a no-show.