McConnell tells the president he should have done what he had actually done.

imag0463-copy

Back when talk began about the Justice Against Support of Terrorism Act (JASTA) that would allow victims of 9/11 to sue Saudi Arabia for its alleged support of those who flew the planes into the World Trade Center, people who opposed it, like President Obama, pointed out that there could be unintended consequences like having our troops sued because of the collateral damage deaths due to bombings, ground raids, and drone attacks.

So when the Act passed, President Obama vetoed it because he thought, as he had stated before, that it could set a dangerous precedent, and other countries might start suing us for the things we have done, and might do.

For the first time in his tenure in office, he had a veto overridden by both houses of congress.

They would show him.

And show him they did.

Except, now that they overrode the veto, many lawmakers are seeing and admitting that the Act needs a little work.

After ignoring his reasons to oppose the bill and for his veto, however, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell claimed,

“That was a good example, it seems to me, of a failure to communicate early about the potential consequences of a piece of legislation. By the time everybody seemed to focus on some potential consequences of it, members had already basically taken a position.”

“I think it was just a ball dropped. I wish the president — I hate to blame everything on him, and I don’t — but it would have been helpful had he, uh, we had a discussion about this much earlier than last week.”

However, a while back, Republicans accused Obama of doing too much to kill the bill, and Senate Republican Whip John Cornyn had complained,

 “Unfortunately, the administration has worked to undercut progress of this legislation at every turn. It appears that the Obama administration is pulling out all the stops to keep this bill from moving forward. I wish the President and his aides would spend as much time and energy working with us in a bipartisan manner as they have working against us trying to prevent victims of terrorism from receiving the justice they deserve.”
The Ayurveda approach of explaining digestion is very simple and can be done anywhere or any place you just viagra 25mg have to go through an online consultation process. Effective instructional managers and leaders create a safe environment for staffs, using dialogue rather than dictates to keep the focus on core instructional issues (Supovitz and cialis sale Poglinco). 3. However, you must keep in mind that ordering viagra from canada cannot increase your sex drive. Life proves to be the most exquisite mode of space with viagra samples.
They reached for a faux patriotic ploy, an image of concern, and now realize the president was most likely correct to oppose the bill the House and Senate had rushed to pass.

So, their mistake is his fault.

At least that is how they want people to see i.

And some, of course, will.

They seem to forget that back in April when being interviewed by Charlie Rose on CBS This Morning, a transcript of which was published on Breitbart, so the GOP, at least, had two opportunities to learn the president’s stance, President Obama had stated,

“This is a matter of how generally the United States approaches our interactions with other countries. If we open up the possibility that individuals in the United States can routinely start suing other governments, then we are also opening up the United States to being continually sued by individuals in other countries”.

But Mitch McConnell believes President Obama had said nothing until just before the veto.

Acknowledging President Obama’s concerns that the bill could subject U.S. service members to lawsuits in foreign courts, House Speaker Paul Ryan has even suggested that the House might take up a bill to fix problems with the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act. But, that won’t be until after the election recess.

So, perhaps, if they had listened as far back as April before the Act was voted on in May, they would have addressed this concern before the Act was passed, and they would not now have to go back and rework it.

But they ignored President Obama then so they  would look more empathetic toward the victims’ families while that mean ol’ Obama turned his back, but  now have to redo things because in reality he was right, and they had actually done nothing for the good of the families, but played politics with them as their pawns, and, oops, they goofed.

 

Leave a Reply