I guess it is Conservative Logic.
If something happens while the president is doing something, what he is doing causes another unrelated event that, apparently, he should have seen coming.
When President Obama announced that relations with Cuba would go through a normalization process, obviously this would involve some sort of visitation.
When he went to Cuba all was quiet on most fronts, especially the European one.
But when the terrorist attacks took place in Brussels, for some reason, conservative saw a cause and effect relationship.
Somehow, President Obama should have known this would happen, so he should have canceled the trip, and at in the White House just in case something somewhere happened.
People thought it was odd that Nancy Reagan consulted with an astrologer before doing anything, but as unbiblical as this might have been, it apparently paid off and just might be the conservative’s way of dealing with things then, now, and in the future.
Former George W Bush speechwriter and current Washington Post contributor Marc Thiessen tweeted, “Brussels under attack. Obama on a tourist trio [sic] in Havana with his family. Says it all.”
Apparently he believes W’s reading that book on goats to that class of kids may have explained all that needed to be explained about 9/11.
Richard Grenell, a former Mitt Romney advisor, wrote, “Terrible optics: ISIS attacks Brussels and Obama is with the Castro Brothers in Cuba.”
And Jim Geraghty, who writes for the National Review tweeted, “Obama’s G20 trip continued as planned after San Bernardino attack. Why would we expect the Cuba trip to change after the Brussels attack?”
I’m waiting for the President had two cups of coffee at breakfast, and look what happened tweet.
But as most thinking people can see, this is just another situation where those who never wanted him to be president, and grabbing at non-sequitors to misrepresent reality by confusing people with the tactic that an accusation made is an accusation proved.