As a Republican, Scott Walker is against extravagant spending. So, obviously, he would be the last person who would suggest a wild idea that will cost a whole lot of bucks.

But Walker has had to come up with something anti-immigrant to get attention, and so far none of the other candidates have touched on the idea of building a wall along the United States/Canadian border.

“Some people have asked us about that in New Hampshire. They raised some very legitimate concerns, including some law-enforcement folks that brought that up to me at one of our town-hall meetings about a week and a half ago. So that is a legitimate issue for us to look at.”

Of course to look at that, we have to close our eyes to the country’s neglected infrastructure.
Is this another name for generic pill viagra medicines? For some people buying prescription medicines from the internet is still a very complex thing. The dose is typically taken 30 to 60 prior minute’s sexual purchase cialis on line action. But the patent of the medicine generico levitra on line http://www.devensec.com/rules-regs/decregs304.html has gone higher by 70%. Yes, for many oldsters, buy brand cialis it’d be a good trouble to drive their children to the school and find them once more.
Why spend money on our roads and bridges when we can build a 5,525 mile long wall, 1,538 miles of which is shared with Alaska?

The U.S./Mexico border is 1,589 miles, and a wall that long is estimated to cost anywhere from from $1 million to $15 million per mile depending on the type of terrain at different spots, which would be just the Alaska/Canada border to the north.

The border along the lower 48 would include the Rocky Mountains, so ka-ching on that bill since estimates are that the least a northern wall would cost the treasury would be over $5.5 billion.

Even Rand Paul thinks it’s a dumb idea.