In 1989 The Washington D.C. city council passed the Human Rights Act that contained the Armstrong Amendment, a religious exemption to what was contained in the act. In 2014 the Washington, D.C. city council repealed that amendment so that GLBTQ students would be protected from discrimination in religious schools.

All citizens should be treated equally.

However, two Republican senators, Ted Cruz of Texas and James Lankford of Oklahoma have decided that protecting GLBTQ kids from discrimination in religious settings is not a good idea, and have filed a resolution to repeal the DC law. They see no problem with GLBTQ children having no protection against discrimination.

The MetroWeekly, a GLBT news paper in D.C., explains that the two Senators “insist that the act violates the freedom of religion of educational institutions who might otherwise be forced to recognize gay students groups, in opposition to their religious beliefs regarding homosexuality, as well as those who choose to attend those schools.”

Cruz and Lankford claim that with the new Human Rights Act of 2014 the City Council “is attempting to force religious institutions to provide services, make employment decisions, or participate in activities that directly violate their faith”.

In a press release issued by Cruz he stated that “No government entity should be able to coerce organizations – whether they be non-profits or religious schools – into funding abortion services or promoting gender policy that is contrary to the organization’s fundamental mission”.

He justifies this by stating, “Rather than discriminating against pro-life and religious organizations, D.C. should welcome diversity of thought and protect the freedom of conscience. We must stop this assault on the Catholic Church, and we must act to protect religious liberty. Congress has a constitutional responsibility to oversee the nation’s capital, and I urge my colleagues in both houses to pass this resolution and affirm the First Amendment rights of all citizens.”

So in order to protect “religious liberty”, diversity of thought, and the First Amendment rights of all citizens, diversity, and the First Amendment rights of GLBTQ students must be eliminated.

It basically initiates the proper flow of important source cialis no prescription usa blood into the organ for increasing its strength. If we talk about the comparison of cost between both, kamagra costs less than that of http://icks.org/n/data/ijks/1483321953_ij_file.pdf viagra prices in usa, which made it highly demanded by most of ED patients. This medicament also works to viagra for sale avail the victim’s penile tissues with affluent blood supply in order to provide them a qualitative relief. These populations are at a higher risk than others because of their specific vulnerable points. viagra discount check it right here now In his press release Senator Lankford said, “What the D.C. Council has done is a major threat to the fundamental right to religious freedom for D.C. residents and organizations, and a brazen display of intolerance”.

To these two senators equal treatment of Washington D.C.’s GLBTQ students is a “a brazen display of intolerance”, and the recognition of their Human Rights is a violation of religious tenets.

Discrimination of them should be allowed because a person can claim such treatment is religious freedom, and, besides, not being allowed to be intolerant toward them is intolerance.

The coalition opposing both Cruz and Lankford’s resolutions point out that they are conveniently claiming the Human Rights Act of 2014 is an unprecedented assault on religious liberty.

And as the opponents point out, “Religious liberty is a fundamental American value. It guarantees us the freedom to hold any belief we choose and the right to act on our religious beliefs, but it does not allow us to discriminate against or otherwise harm others”.

Washington D.C. has “home rule”, but anything the city Council does has to be approved by the House and Senate, even though the city has no representation in either. If the Cruz/Lankford resolution is to go into effect both house must approve it, and then the president must sign it.

Matthew 19: 13-15
Then some children were brought to Him so that He might lay His hands on them and pray; and the disciples rebuked them. But Jesus said, “Let the children alone, and do not hinder them from coming to Me; for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these.” After laying His hands on them, He departed from there.

I guess the children have to be the right ones, though.