Conservative politicians who rely on the conservative religious vote and who are using legislatures to promote their religious beliefs as superior to the U.S. Constitution put 10 Commandment monuments wherever they can on pubic land, and then waste public funds fighting those who see this as a violation of the Constitution since it establishes one religion over all others.

Their only defense is that it is actually an historic monument, but how stupid do they think people really are.

The actual order and wording of the 10 Commandments varies depending on your denomination or branch of the Abrahamic tradition as the Hebrew version has a different numbering than the Evangelical Christian version, as does the Roman Catholic version.

So obviously, they are not pushing a universal document when they claim it is an historical one, but, rather, they promote their own evangelical sect, especially when it becomes obvious these monuments are the work of evangelical politicians..

But in their eagerness to push their religious belief on the rest of us, they seem to forget the second of the Commandments,
“You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not bow down to them nor serve them. For I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and fourth generations of those who hate Me, but showing mercy to thousands, to those who love Me and keep My Commandments”.

They seem to worship the monument, as they do not keep the commandment in their hearts.

Then there is that Fifth one, the one that says “Thou shalt not kill.”

If these people really believed in the essence of their monument, they would not be so free to boast about their religious convictions while contradicting themselves and betraying their own claimed beliefs.
Fox News contributor and radio host Todd Starnes recently, when defending the claimed killing of so many people both in Iraq and New Orleans by the hero in the movie “American Sniper” and his characterization of the locals as animals, found fault with Michael Moore’s statement that Jesus would not be on roof tops shooting people in the back when he said, “I’m no theologian, but I suspect Jesus would tell that God-fearing, red-blooded American sniper, ‘Well done, thou good and faithful servant for dispatching another Godless jihadist to the lake of fire.’”

That’s not the Jesus many of my friends have given their lives to. It’s not the Jesus I grew up with either.

It is now Christian to cheer for killing people?

A true pro-life stance.

Then we have Ben Carson, a darling of the Tea Party and a potential Republican candidate for president in 2016.

During his appearance before fans and the press for a question and answer period at this past weekend’s gathering of conservatives in Iowa, when someone asked him about same sex marriage, while he could have said what he thought about that and then moved to the next question, he chose to use the opportunity to expand on his answer and even the content of the question.

He spoke against GLBT demands for equal rights, and complained that a few judges have overthrown the will of the people in 32 states where the majority who voted on people’s rights decided “that marriage is between a man and a woman.”

He condemned the idea that in spite of what people wanted as laws in their states, same sex marriage bans are being overturned by judges who are ruling these laws unconstitutional and invalid.

He did not like the idea that, if people wanted laws that refused people equal rights, these laws were being thrown out.

I guess he was happy with the segregation laws that the South so favored a few years back, and is upset the courts threw them out.

He also complained about people using civil disobedience in an effort to overturn these laws. Clearly he is not a fan of the movie Selma, or Martin Luther King for that matter.

After saying that he had no problem “If two adults want to be together,” he explained that people could establish legal contracts to share property and have visitation rights while experiencing the benefits of marriage without actually being married.

He has a loose grasp of people’s experiences in the real world.

He has a problem with those who go to a baker and, when refused service because the baker has “religious” qualms about serving Gay people, sue the baker for discrimination.

Instead of just explaining why he considered this wrong he said,
“What I have a problem with is when people try to force people to act against their beliefs because they say, ‘they’re discriminating against me.’ So they can go right down the street and buy a cake, but no, let’s bring a suit against this person because I want them to make my cake even though they don’t believe in it. Which is really not all that smart because they might put poison in that cake.”

Why, unless he leaned in that direction, or perhaps was sending a suggestion, would he mention the possibility of a baker pretending to have no problem making the cake so he could poison the customer.

He certainly has a low opinion about the intelligence of Gay people and the religious convictions of his fellow Christian.

Is this poisoning thing something he just accepts that a Christian baker would do?

How in any way is this a Christian attitude?

Yes, if you purchase through the online mode, you will get generic tadalafil from india of Pfizer and the generic viagra of different brands. In blend with sexual incitement, Tadalafil works by http://cute-n-tiny.com/cute-animals/momongas/ generic viagra cheap expanding blood stream to the penis to get a firm erection throughout the sexual incitement. There is no need to commander viagra Continue to website suffer from performance anxiety. Sounds familiar, right? cute-n-tiny.com viagra soft pills Unquestionably, technology has made our lives quite easy and you can get its benefit here too with kamagra.