Kyrsten Sinema did not just kill the Voting Rights Bill as she said she would but took the dramatic step to do so on the senate floor in a speech defending the filibuster that effectively killed the bill on the spot.
The filibuster is a senate rule that requires a 60-vote threshold for most bills to proceed through the Senate. It is a convenient and lazy replacement for s senator standing up and speaking until time for consideration ran out.
Without 6o votes to pass the bill or to change the rules like what had been done regarding the Debt Ceiling, in a very public way complete with an unnecessary lecture, both the Freedom to Vote and and the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act died.
She threw the bill in front of those who have been opposing a minimum amount of early voting days and reinstating federal regulations that help mitigate discriminatory voting practices which would make voting more accessible.
In the past, Sinema favored avoiding the filibuster by using the reconciliation process because Republicans
“never had 60 votes and they managed to do a lot of bad things done during that time,”
and stating in the next sentence in that recorded speech,
“The reconciliation process is still quite available, and we will use it for good rather than for evil”.
Not only blind to her sudden about face that belies her claim she always held what she claims now,she does not see the glaring parallel in her reference to Joe Lieberman during the votes on healthcare when the Dems had the senate as she condemned him in that same speech for doing then what she is doing now, i.e. defending the use of the filibuster over reconciliation to get a simple majority vote.
“some might argue we never had 60, because one of those votes was Joseph Lieberman, but that’s whatever. So now there’s none of this false pressure to get to 60… the Democrats can stop kowtowing to Joe Lieberman and instead seek other avenues”.
But, as I watched her speech feeling like Bart Simpson getting a lecture from Marge, one he will erase from memory the moments she stops talking, I was struck by something that just seemed to be so out of place. It could have been a signal of a change of life or something to fool a certain segment of the population that, while, perhaps, not in word and deed, but in ideology, there is a bond, or it was a simple, but odd choice of accessory.
For some reason while she was running for the senate, I would get emails from her campaign. I read up on her, wished her well while accepting the fact that her being pretty much on the other side of the country needed less of my attention than local things. I was, therefore, happy that she won.
Although she was born and raised as a Mormon, she now claims to have no religion, and that would include any Christianity in whatever form.
She is the first U.S. Senator to claim no religion. When she was sworn in as senator, she put her hand on the Constitution, not the Bible, signaling her separation from religion and her acknowledgment that the Constitution, not the Bible, is the foundation of the laws in this country.
After admitting these two laws are important because,
“The state laws we seek to address are symptoms of a larger, more deeply-rooted problem facing our democracy – the divisions themselves, which have hardened in recent years, and have combined with rampant Get in touch with me to find out if herbal female sexual enhancement pills really work is http://cute-n-tiny.com/cute-animals/sleepy-ferret/ cialis prices to try it for yourself. Hence, they are likely to be overlooked and not assumed as comorbidity cute-n-tiny.com viagra generika online symptoms. When ginseng was studied recently in independent studies, it was shown that ginseng can increase energy levels of the person, things are already grasped. buy generic sildenafil This is an inhibiting enzyme which stops the buy cheap sildenafil erection of the penis. disinformation to push too many Americans away from our basic Constitutional values,”
And that
“I share the concerns of civil rights advocates and others I have heard from in recent months about these state laws.
I strongly support those efforts to contest these laws in court, and to invest significant resources into these states to better organize and stop efforts to restrict access at the ballot box.
And I strongly support and will continue to vote for legislative responses to address these state laws – including the Freedom to Vote Act and the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, that the Senate is currently considering,”
She explained that rather than skip over the filibuster, at least bringing t hebill up for a discussion and a vote the results of which could go either way, because there are problems with the rule and its application, it should be allowed to stand with possible adjustments later.
She sees the rule is wrong and should be redone, modified, eliminated by bringing back the requirement to hold the floor, but would rather let states trample on people’s voting rights and get around to doing corrections later.
Sinema sees her she-shed on fire and stands there with a connected hose waiting for the firetruck to arrive rather than take a simple step to avoid greater destruction in the meantime.
The thing that got me, though, was not what she was saying. I’ve heard her say much the same before. I usually have C-SPAN or something non-plotted droning in the background as I drink my morning coffee while sketching cartoon idea only needing to occasionally look at the TV screen. And while Kyrsten Sinema was speaking I happened to look at the screen and there was just that one little, almost unnoticeable something different about her appearance.
It wasn’t her hair, a new set of glasses or the dress she was wearing.
It was the perfectly sized, silver cross on a chain hanging around the neck of a person who claims no religion and is noted as a senator for that.
Who was meant to see it?
.
.
.
.
.
.
