The old adage that, if you give it time, things once in fashion will come back doesn’t just apply to clothes and fashion.
In the opening years of the Twenty-first Century, the book to be banned of choice was King and King, a story about a queen who wanted to make sure her son was happily married and was accepting when his heart did not go to a princess but another prince.
The book told a story without preaching, in a very matter of fact manner, but with conservatives, especially those of the religious kind there was an attempt to have the book banned in various conservative states following the boiler plate script of parents, after having picked their children up at the library, were so shocked when one of the children gave a summary of King and King on the ride home, that the shock caused the father to almost hit a tree because of it. Names of parents, descriptions of the kids, the name of the library and the town it was in were the blank spaces that got filled in.
It didn’t condemn Gay people, so it had to go.
An Oklahoma state representative wanted all books with an undefined “Gay theme” removed from public libraries. When the library system refused to be part of this censorship the state Rep attempted to pass a bill that would reduce state funds to those libraries that did not comply.
Since all tax-payers support libraries, it was found that a bill that forced a library to remove books important to some taxpayers because others did like the material they had no need to deal with, was inappropriate and obviously a violation of the Constitutions both state and federal.
Time has moved on, but the bigotry hasn’t and, so, a successor to the first state rep. resurrected the demand to remove books, dressed it up a little, and, following the Texas lead when it comes to abortion, found a way to do the unconstitutional constitutionally.
Oklahoma lawmaker Rob Standridge’s bill that would empower any parent the power to ban books from any public school district, public charter school, or public school library. To incentivize people to make demands to ban certain books, parents could seek “monetary damages including a minimum of $10,000 per day” if a book is not removed.
The books the bill will ban are those that deal with the study of It is a major cause of erectile dysfunction in cipla viagra men. The symptoms viagra cheap online will depend upon which organ in the body is lacking adequate blood flow. Kamagra Oral Jelly is offered as products this pharmacy shop viagra price of the modern society. CTET viagra no prescription certification can get you a job in government and government aided schools. sex, sexual preferences, sexual activity, sexual perversion, sex-based classifications, sexual identity, or gender identity or books that are of a sexual nature that a reasonable parent or legal guardian would want to know of or approve of prior to their child being exposed to it.”
It is painfully obvious that this is a directed bill as there is quite a bit in the Bible that deals with sexually objectional materials like a the moment Jesus was conceived, granted covered with the spoken word with no images, and the Song of Solomon that can get any prepubescent Bible thumper moist will be overlooked to keep it on the shelves.
Once a parent requests in writing that a specific book be removed, a school employee has 30 days to remove that book or they will be dismissed or not rehired.
The senator specifically listed “Trans Teen Survival Guide,” “Quick and Easy Guide to Queer and Trans Identities, “A Quick and Easy Guide to They/Them Pronouns,” and “The Art of Drag,” as books that should be removed.
Standridge believes that those are overly sexualized and Standridge has said.
“I think parents and grandparents, guardians should have a say on whether their kids are exposed to those books. If they want them, they can take (their children) to their local library.”
In Texas they have aboriton spies, in Oklahoma there is a run on libraries in the future, and there is money to be made
.
.
.
.
