In a previous blog, after admitting I am not a very big sports fan, actually not at all, I made the suggestion that in their early years, kids just be exposed to sports, if they are so inclined, minus any division of abilities based on suppositions related to gender.

Little, hardly developed humans have no say in how their bodies will develop when given opportunities or denied them so, before any development begins it is counterproductive and wrong to treat the developing body like a tomato grown in a small box. It is a tomato, but it was not allowed to be the round tomato it could have been, but was forced to grow square by someone else’s decision.

If a boy and a girl find they both like baseball and play on the same team, each will have the equal opportunity to develop their skills without being subjected to traditional limits and their influence, and any natural difference between girls and boys sports bodies will manifest themselves naturally over time as opposed to being the pre-programmed result of manufactured and unproven limits.

Either could end up better at the sport than the other if they are allowed to just play the sport.

Some boys will be better at a sport than some girls and some girls would be better than some boys, but that holds true in gender-segregated sports as not every boy or girl on the gender specific team can be a sports star on that team.

The laws banning Trans girls and women from playing in their gender sport are too often, if not always in the majority, based  on false information passed around by the people with a prejudice, an agenda, and an outlet. Their argument is that they are protecting the cis-gender females from the “boys” who want to play on the girls’ team. The boy/girl thing is proof that they have not bothered to understand what Transgender actually means.

The supposed reason to prevent “boys” playing girls’ sports, is because it gives them a physical advantage, but the reverse, if ever, is rarely mentioned, the idea of a Trans-boy entering a boys’ sport.

To the willfully uninformed for convenience this would be a “girl” playing on a boys sports team.

No one assumes he is better, and no one fears he will take all the trophies, but rather he would be weak like the girls, a clear admission that one’s biological body develops according to those opportunities it has to develop without artificial limits, and the people with authority do not want their beliefs shattered if it becomes clear that females, having been given the same opportunities as males from the very beginning of either’s sports career, would develop equally, while the system admittedly creates and promotes the differences.

We hear about men dressing up as women, the GOP and Evangelical understanding of the complexities of being Transgender, so they can prey on women in the ladies’ room whenever Transgender rights, the ones with which they were endowed by their Creator, are discussed and bills proposed for and against, but no one ever mentions women dressing up as men and preying on the boys in the men’s rooms.

“But the latter doesn’t happen, or at least not often enough and widely enough to be on most people’s radar,” one might say while ignoring that during every “Bathroom Bill” debate, those attempting to deny Transgender people their full Creator endowed inalienable rights refuse to accept that when it came to reported crimes or complaints lodged about Transgender people preying in ladies’ room, it didn’t happen either.

The assumption is obvious. A man in a dress would be able to take advantage of any woman in the room, while a woman dressed as a man would know she didn’t stand a chance against any man in the room, and so just stays away.

If the objections to Transgender people were based merely on science, or a weak understanding of it which would just need a little more information to be corrected, or even verses in the Bible that were found after the fact and easily twisted to be useful, the discussion would have a good chance of being  reasonable, swift, and positive, but the main objection has nothing to do with Transgender per se, but the assumed assault it is on male fragility and toxic masculinity.

They are protecting the women from an unseen and non-existent threat because they are men and strong, the women weak and dependent.  It also works pretty well in making the men, who know they will never have to actually do any protecting, look manly without having to prove it like those kids in middle school who only demand a fight if they know there is a teacher close enough to step in before the first punch is thrown. They object that a man for any reason would give up his manhood, if manhood was only defined by wardrobe, and give up his superiority. And they are desperately attempting to hide the falseness of their present self-protection of masculinity system that denies giving equal opportunity to males, females and every gender variant on the spectrum because if they can achieve equally the ruse of the superior male would be blow wide open.

Or, again, why no objection to a “Girl” playing a boy’s sport with the same vehemence of legislative proposals.

In spite of that, if you are very get viagra overnight fond of taking outside food more often during the weak, you are likely getting a placebo or a sugar pill. It prevents blood clotting and improves the circulation of blood to the women’s genitals on being stimulated thereby strengthening the orgasm free get viagra http://cute-n-tiny.com/cute-animals/merry-christmas/ and helping achieve multiple orgasms. They deserve to have two parents who don’t undermine each other to their children and who speak respectfully to each other in front of their children. cheapest cialis However , it is prudent to remember about the extent to which you can use cheap price viagra .

The argument is not based on facts, especially when one side accepts a fact that supports them while a companion fact that shows they are mistaken is just ignored.

The guys in charge are afraid women will not stay in their assigned, not chosen, lane.

The most recent defensive action was the bill passed recently in Kansas that bans Transgender athletes in girls’ school sports.

Republicans in DC are all atwitter about the horror of life for women without such bans, but then have no problem with voting against a law that would protect women from violence, and twenty state legislatures are pushing for similar bans like the one that Kansas just passed, in spite of proponents being unable to cite examples of transgender students’ participation causing problems.

The trope that Transgender women using the ladies’ rooms was an invitation to open season on ladies rooms where no instances could be cited that would make this law necessary and not just a political statement using a group du jour as the monster under the bed was dusted off and reworked.

The state association that oversees middle and high school activities in Kansas acknowledged that it is aware of only five transgender students currently active in any K-12 activities, and none of them, nor any before, has ever reached champion status.

They are just another girl on the team that has better girls on it.

Supporters also have an odd and somewhat blind defense of the ban. They argue that the bill  would protect the hard-won opportunities in sports and other activities for women since federal civil rights laws in the 1970s while denying those rights to girls just because others, not the girls themselves, refuse to get educated on the topic.

Brittany Jones, advocacy director for the conservative Family Policy Alliance of Kansas offered this open-ended defense of the bill,

“Courts have consistently held that there are differences between men and women that matter in select instances. Athletics is one of those instances. Girls desire a fair playing field. That is all this bill provides. To every female athlete – this is a declaration that there is a place for you to shoot for the stars in Kansas.”

It is clear from the comments of politicians that this law is not to address a problem, but to anticipate one that hasn’t happened yet.

The male legislators who spoke in favor of the ban stressed that natural differences mean that men are naturally the superior athletes in almost every sport.

Republican state senator Mark Steffen, an anesthesiologist, said the bill was based on “indisputable physiological facts” which added up show “the male as a genetically and time-engineered superior machine.”

His colleague Virgil Peck backed the bill so he could take a stand for “young ladies, natural-born females”, asking,

“Have we – men – given away our manpower to the snowflakes? Are we going to allow someone to carry around our manhood in their fanny pack or in their purse? Are there no longer any alpha males who will stand and defend our young ladies, our wives, our daughters, our granddaughters, our neighbors’ wives, daughters, and granddaughters?”

It is not anti-Transgender.

It is pro-cartoon guys.