The Southern Baptist Convention split from the wider Baptist Church because, according to their interpretation of the Bible, slavery was a good thing that needed to be preserved as the gift from God it was. There was that Tower of Babel business that had divided the world into separate languages with the affected builders moving to live together with those who spoke the same language.

Then people kept building better boats and wagons eventually going all over the world and meeting people very much unlike themselves.

God’s plan to keep the races separate didn’t take into account that boat and wagon thing. It’s like He didn’t see that coming.

Losing the Civil War eventually brought about the Jim Crow laws that made segregation legal with one such law, Biblically based, making interracial marriages illegal.

Conservatives believed then, and probably still do now, that God and Scripture defined what marriage is, and, as far as interracial marriage, believe that since God has specially gifted the various races with a specific rational soul we should encourage preservation of God’s designing the various races to live among themselves and not mix.

To do otherwise is to go against the Bible which is clear that no changes are allowed.

Psalm 119:160; “All your words are true; all your righteous laws are eternal

Psalm 100:5; “For the Lord is good and his love endures forever.” Psalm 33:11; But the plans of the Lord stand firm forever, the purposes of his heart through all generations.”

See, no changes.

The belief is that there are clear demarcations in nature that are clear for every kind or species of plant and animal and that for thousands of years, plants and animals have stuck to that design.

Segregation affected marriage, churches, schools, the military, the workplace, and neighborhoods supported by religion. Difference in Race was not only unacceptable in marriage, but also in the churches of America. Even the U.S. Military had a long history of racial segregation.

Until the middle of the 20th Century the idea of using scripture to support interracial marriage was unthinkable, and interracial marriage only became legal with the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Loving v. Virginia which struck down Virginia’s miscegenation law that had been justified by Judge Leon Bazile who has ruled.

 “Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and He placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with His arrangement there would be no cause or such marriages. The fact that He separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix.”

Until 1967, someone like Clarence Thomas could not have married the woman with whom he fell in love because of laws based on the Biblical division of the races given by God who cannot be questioned.

So although Thomas’s marriage would have been looked at askance in the beginning, and although by the time he graduated from high school that battle, which he never fought, had been won by others, he has been married legally while earlier generations were not allowed that right, and in being in an interracial marriage defied the Biblical design, and had little concern for those who clung to the inerrancy of the Bible.

He married whom he chose without regard to its being something that made religious people unhappy as it was an assault on their firmly held religious beliefs.

Pastor Dan Gayman of the Church of Israel, a Christian congregation in Missouri explains the need to avoid interracial marriages.

As we have already mentioned, an online pharmacy has many cheapest price for cialis https://pdxcommercial.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/1615-NE-42nd-Ave.-Brochure-1.pdf different benefits and advantages. With a proper faith and teaching methods, viagra levitra online https://pdxcommercial.com/technology-gives-brokers-deeper-insights-customers-cre-interests/technology/ we can improve them much batter. The growing dysfunctional relationship works against both father and buy levitra son. So, in order to get best possible effect on the sexual organ during intimate activity, a man buy levitra should be swallowing this drug approximately 45 minutes before sexual intercourse.

“A silent killer is stalking the streets of America, while millions are hard at work and going about their daily routines.  This silent killer is invading their homes, schools, churches, and communities. Of course this killer does not advertise its lethal and genocidal danger.  On the contrary, it comes clothed in approval, openly accepted as the new normal and just as welcome in the new America as pre-marital sex, abortion on demand, lethal birth control, men and women living together outside of marriage, use of marijuana, and embracing the despicable act of homosexuality as though it were a test of our tolerance and love. For the new America, everything that previous generations found abhorrent is fully acceptable.  Should it be any surprise, then, that miscegenation, another term for interracial marriage, is bringing genocide to White America and is even more common than the murder of unborn children? –

He is talking about the marriage of Clarence Thomas.

For 360 years statutory law banned miscegenation in most states. Today, anyone who speaks against miscegenation is immediately labeled a racist or bigot. Yet, since the  Biblical belief is that the vast majority of the separate and diverse races have practiced segregation and considered interracial mixing harmful to all races, and every separate and distinct race, following the Law of Kind after His Kind enumerated ten times in Genesis one, was created for a definite purpose as each race bears God’s original design in the function for which they were created the belief that, after having created all races with some plan in mind God saw that it was good, is a strongly held religious belief that Clarence Thomas should have respected and not acted against Even if his marriage was made possible

The first Monday of October is the first day back for the Supreme Court, and this year, the first order of business for Clarence Thomas was to issue an opinion that attacked the 2015 Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges – which legalized marriage equality in all 50 states.

He claimed that the 2015 decision “bypassed” the “democratic process” and cause people “with sincerely held religious beliefs concerning marriage” to “find it increasingly difficult to participate in society.”

“By choosing to privilege a novel constitutional right over the religious liberty interests explicitly protected in the First Amendment, and by doing so undemocratically, the Court has created a problem that only it can fix. Until then, Obergefell will continue to have ‘ruinous consequences for religious liberty.’”

His marriage came about the same way as Obergfell, and was the extension of a novel Constitutional right that, while it actually existed since the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, had been conveniently ignored by the White majority population, and an affront to firmly held religious beliefs.

His statement was in relation to Scotus not hearing the case of Kim Davis the County clerk who had refused same sex couples marriage licenses because of her firmly held religious beliefs whose appeals to the judgement that she was in the wrong made its way to the Supreme Court.

To Thomas, Davis is a “devout Christian” who was “one of the first victims of this Court’s cavalier treatment of religion in its Obergefell decision,” and, whereas Obergfell extended rights to people who should have already had them, Thomas sees it aqs an attack on religion.

“Obergefell enables courts and governments to brand religious adherents who believe that marriage is between one man and one woman as bigots, making their religious liberty concerns that much easier to dismiss. Since Obergefell, parties have continually attempted to label people of good will as bigots merely for refusing to alter their religious beliefs in the wake of prevailing orthodoxy.”

Does this man have any memory?

The choice is to continue to defend the rights spelled out in our Civil Constitution, or to remove those rights because the bigots who hide behind religion don’t like it when they are called according to their action, bigots.