Let’s be honest.

 it was not Professor Pamela Karlan who misused Melania’s son when during her December 4 appearance before the House Judiciary Committee in explaining that Trump can’t do “anything he wants” no matter how powerful he wants to act because Article 2 of the Constitution does not give him the power to do anything he wants, she said,

 “The Constitution says there can be no titles of nobility, so while the president can name his son Barron, he can’t make him a baron.”

She merely used his name without making any comment about the kid, making it clear that Trump did not have monarchical power.

It was the Republicans on the committee and Melania herself who did that when hours after Karlan made that quip, Baron’s mother tweeted,

 “A minor child deserves privacy and should be kept out of politics. Pamela Karlan, you should be ashamed of your very angry and obviously biased public pandering, and using a child to do it.”

Melania not only reminded people of what was said, but added the politics by adding the part about pandering.

The time delay between Karlan’s quip and Melania’s tweet would seem to rule out a reaction from an angry mother, but supports the idea that her tweet was carefully worded and timed for maximum effect to weaken professor Katlan’s veracity. Melania either missed the point, ignored the point, or allowed the Party machine to frame it for a useful purpose. A truly outraged parent would not have waited hours to respond and do so in formal political language.

Melania is the one who allowed her son to be used as a political pawn as one of the republicans on the committee read the tweet to get it into the record.

It gave Representative Matt Gaetz of Florida the opportunity to act righteous while repeating the kid’s name and then some when he chided Karlan saying,

“Let me also suggest that when you invoke the President’s son’s name here, when you try to make a little joke out of referencing Barron Trump, that does not lend credibility to your argument. It makes you look mean. It makes you look like you’re Such conditions are amenable downtownsault.org ordering viagra without prescription to and respond to herbal remedies, which contain time tested active ingredients. This particular drug is also used to prevent check for source viagra generic uk premature ejaculation. And 46% of men and 38% of women, which were 60 to 70 years-old, http://downtownsault.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/06-12-13-DDA-Minutes.doc viagra prices (with approx. same age partners) were having sex just as often. This is very important to make sure that the treatment or the medicine which you are taking is safe for your body. 100mg viagra cost downtownsault.org attacking someone’s family, the minor child of the president of the United States.”

Granted, Melania’s pet project is said to be reducing bullying, but it seems a little too selective.

And this example of it proves that.

After youth climate activist, sixteen year old Greta Thunberg, delivered her speech at the U.N. Climate Action Summit, President Donald Trump mocked her tweeting,

“She seems like a very happy young girl looking forward to a bright and wonderful future. So nice to see!”

I watched the speech, and unlike his patronizing and dismissive description, she was anything but happy, especially as she told world leaders they had

 “stolen my dreams, my childhood, with your empty word” and that “we are in the beginning of a mass extinction,” asking, “How dare you pretend that this can be solved with just business as usual and some technical solutions?”

Trump dismissed this passion with a “There, there” dismissal.

She wasn’t legitimately angry; she was just throwing a mild, pouting tantrum.

Sweet little girls should not be serious or angry, and their anger should be dismissed when expressed. Sugar and spice and all that. They really have nothing to say.

On Fox News, Michael Knowles demeaned Thunberg by referring to her Asperger’s syndrome as her being a “mentally ill Swedish child.”

Thunberg responded to Trumps verbal childishness with a more mature tweet,

 “A very happy young girl looking forward to a bright and wonderful future.”

Did her husband’s using Greta bother Melania?

Was she okay with his obviously biased public pandering?