A year ago when people were addressing ways to reduce the spread of Coronavirus with information changing frequently, the sheriff of Bristol County Massachusetts refused to take the steps that the DAs in the state had come up with for virus spread mitigation mainly because, like his hero Trump, he boasted that only he could solve this while he claimed any demand that he follow these simple steps like releasing to home quarantine those who were incarcerated for minor and victimless crimes, inability to post bail for minor offences, or just about to get out at the end of their served sentences were anti-Trump and politically motivated.
His claims were often disproven by simple research and by inspections by such entities as the Department of Health and the investigation after the May 1, 2020 disturbance at his ICE detention pleasure dungeon which found he had not followed his own protocols and that the protocols he was following were dated and did not include those recommended by the CDC to deal with Covid 19. His preventive measures were like that of someone wanting to avoid a pregnancy after sex by immediately jumping up and down because someone he liked told him that works while avoiding actually birth control that is based on science.
While claiming to be an oasis in the opening month of the pandemic, as figures leaked out, they began to differ from his claims with a widening gulf developing over time.
As many readers of this blog might remember that the state’s Attorney General’s Office concluded in its report that,
“The Bristol County Sheriff Office’s calculated use of force included the use of a variety of less-lethal but dangerous weapons— including a flash bang grenade, pepper-ball launchers, pepper spray canisters, anti-riot shields, and canines—against detainees who had exhibited calm and nonviolent behavior for at least an hour before this operation. The BCSO deployed these weapons both indiscriminately upon entry and also specifically against particular detainees who were not combative, assaultive, or otherwise actively resisting staff. Informing our conclusion that the BCSO’s use of force was excessive.”
“The BCSO violated the civil rights of the detainees …… by using excessive force against the ICE B detainees and by acting with deliberate indifference to a substantial risk of serious injury or harm to the detainees and their health,”
making it obvious that he had actually lost control of the situation over which he claimed to have had complete and legal control.
Any critic of his refusal to follow medically base common sense was dismissed as Anti-Trump anti-American radicalism.
A year after the Pandemic began and a year of refusal to do the correct thing, a federal judge ruling in the class action case of Savino v Souza that challenged what we were led to believe by the sheriff was a city on a hill when it came to addressing Covid in his facilities. both the major one in Dartmouth and the secondary one on Ash Street in New Bedford where Lizzie Borden spent time during her trial and is the oldest jail The World’s Strongest Acaiis also regarded as a prescription drug so just those men cialis sales online may take it who suffers from erectile dysfunction, after getting a doctor’s prescription. In such cases a way to deal with a complex variety of issues every day such as sensory integration dysfunction, ADHD, and similar cialis properien http://appalachianmagazine.com/2018/10/17/if-the-world-could-just-snap-green-beans-with-granny-again/ challenges. Its job is to sell you drugs to fix whatever might ail you. viagra without prescription usa appalachianmagazine.com Silagra is the medication that helps the person to make cialis discount cheap appalachianmagazine.com a doctor’s appointment, spend money on expensive gas driving to the doctor since there might be some other problem or else you can always look through sites that are well rated online. in the United States still in use ruled that the conditions at the Bristol County House of Correction due to the COVID-19 pandemic, was asked to approve a settlement agreement.
So far, overriding his refusal to follow the plan for the selective “cite and release” program, the case filed by Lawyer’s for Civil Rights (LFCR) has reduced the number of people held in his Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention center has resulted in a reduction of 148 detainees to 7 with the 139 returned home to quarantine, something the sheriff could have done without costing the taxpayers the price of his defense.
The Court decided that the Bristol County House of Corrections run by Sheriff Thomas Hodgson would most likely be found to have been deliberately indifferent to detainee’s health and safety needs due to poor mitigation procedures, not testing detainees while claiming no one in the detention center was Covid positive, inadequate contact tracing, and failure to reduce overcrowding.
43 individuals have been released on bail, others have been paying the bond set by Immigration Judges, some had obtained relief in their immigration cases, and the remainder voluntarily released, although with this sheriff “voluntarily” was not reasonable and informed, but reluctantly done.
ICE could not admit new individuals to detention without Court approval, and this sustained population reduction and set a maximum, and testing was be made available to class members and BCHOC staff.
If the judge agrees to the proposed settlement, the Sheriff must continue to release those on bail, and the 7 detainees remaining after the release of those 143 will be given the option of transferring to another New England ICE facility.
Taking a person’s victims that have been supplied by repeatedly questionable application of immigration policies so that he could violate the civil rights of the detainees in order to promote his he-man, macho, pillar of law and order cartoon image which relied on treating his detainees as he did, is going to be tough for the sheriff, but clearer heads prevailed and the detainees representatives (LFCR) and the sheriff people have both asked the Court to preliminarily approve the settlement now and hold a Final Fairness Hearing to grant final approval within a month which will have it take place after the first anniversary of the “riot” at the ICE Detention Center that resulted from his cruel and unusual treatment of detainees.
.
.
.
