Doing my daily blog is not a simple process.
It involves wading through the various topics presented daily and coming up with a relevant cartoon. Often, if the blog contains an essay, I will spend hours researching the topic to get the who, what, where, why, and when straight, and after spending time on a cartoon may scrap it for a better idea. During the Trump years, unlike now and before where I can and did settle on a topi early and have my cartoon finished by noon and my day outside the house could begin, I found myself doing multiple cartoons on multiple topics because of the ever-changing actions and comments of the man, and, so, could not settle on what would appear in the morning until just before bedtime.
Before publishing the blog, I read it one more time for Grammar, spelling, and flow. I also will amend any Information that was incorrect or was rendered so toward the end of the day by the actions and words of others if a topic is “live”.
Obviously, I can only cover one topic in each blog, it is a blog, after all, not a book, but rather than deal with the topic, there is always a group of people in the comments section who will demand to know why I did not write about something else, at which point they will state what they preferred I had covered.
This was common when I first started my blog on a local news website where I could not control the comment section and people had free rein to go off on tangents, often resorting to personal attacks on me for not writing about all the possible topics on any given day and for not anticipating what the readers wanted to read.
There were some occasions when on the following day the blog covered one of the demanded topics only for me to be chastised by the original person who had suggested the topic demanding to know why I did not write about yet another topic.
This way they could avoid the chosen topic by deflection and could try to use my blog as the springboard for their writing their own screed without them having to do the work to put their own blog together. These people were parasites, journalistic lampreys who took the free ride and hoped to benefit from that.
The prime example of this was a local politician who would “compliment the blog, and then launch into a short presentation of various parts of his agenda.
These days I control my blog independently and can decide what comments will be kept. That is why the ads for Cialis and complaints about not having written one blog for each individual reader usually featuring the words “what about” just go right in the trash.
As Scientific America found, by the third comment someone has posted a comment on religion, politics, or something unrelated and for the remainder of the thread people are so wrapped up in correcting the wrong of ideas of others, the topic presented for discussion has been totally ignored.
They ended the comment section at the end of online articles.
This practice is not limited to my blog but basically to every post on social media from anyone on any topic and, quite often, anyone who attempts to bring the discussion back to the original topic is seen as irrelevant and dismissed as not following the topic while others insist in stronger wording to express Doctors are not yet sure tadalafil order if this drug can really affect the vision of a person. It also helps in getting rid of a cold feeling in penis and cures nocturnal and speedy emissions. viagra pill for sale Improving dysfunctional cranial rhythmic impulses can improve the flow of cerebral spinal generic prescription viagra fluid and body function generally. Besides, men are becoming more interested in the women with appropriate weight, which get free viagra is why many females are interested in gaining weight. their opinion on the unrelated topic.
It seems these are only excuses for a person to present their own topic on someone else’s website or Facebook page, usually co8uched in language that c0ndemns the writer for supporting something negative because, obviously, if they had opposed something they would have written negatively about it.
I could write that after the months of the pandemic it was such a treat to go to a movie theater to see a movie whose name I include and, in accordance with the Scientific America discovery, within a comment or two, I am being questioned why I saw that movie, why I did not like the one I chose not to see, and whether or not people should wear masks in theaters which, of course, pushes the blog o8ut of the picture as people exchange opinions on the virus and politics often ending in comment-posters insulting each other.
Stating that you like something is seen as a statement that you hate everything else and the justification for a lecture based on assumptions of your character or religious and political views that have nothing to do with the movie experience.
I even have to go back and remind myself what the blog was actually about.
Any attempt by anyone in the thread to comment on the actual topic is met with accusations that that person has gone off topic and the others to double down on the tangent and increase the vitriol.
People reading a blog or a news article are able to skip the comments when they begin to get skippy and move on. Bloggers and news site writers and editors have to read them all.
Simple demand, or perhaps request for those who will jump on the keyboard to wax eloquent on the freedoms that should not be denied ‘Mercans, stick to the topic or say nothing. If another issue other than the one covered is important to you, write your own blog or letter to an editor, but stop using what people post as a springboard for your own issue.
There is a reason writers choose one topic and that is because no human being, no matter how intelligent and informed no matter how talented can cover every possible topic at one time.
Just remember, celebrating Mothers’ Day does not mean you hate fathers, except in the minds of the majority of comment-posters
.
.
.
.
