The harmful toxins in cigarette can pill viagra for sale deeprootsmag.org damage your blood vessels. Generic Sildenafil Citrate Pills best prices on cialis treats most sex problems in men. Kamagra Soft deeprootsmag.org free levitra Tablets It has been another most liked version of the generic sildenafil pills. Physiotherapist Assistant Course The physiotherapist assistant diploma courses are designed to focus on the cialis no prescription canada most important things as a good sexual health results in a healthy and happy life. alt=”” class=”wp-image-15004″ width=”353″ height=”422″/>

In a previous blog, after admitting I am not a very big sports fan, actually not at all, I made the suggestion that in their early years, kids just be exposed to sports, if they are so inclined, minus any division of abilities based on suppositions related to gender.

Little, hardly developed humans have no say in how their bodies will develop when given opportunities or denied them so, before any development begins it is counterproductive and wrong to treat the developing body like a tomato grown in a small box. It is a tomato, but it was not allowed to be the round tomato it could have been, but was forced to grow square by someone else’s decision.

If a boy and a girl find they both like baseball and play on the same team, each will have the equal opportunity to develop their skills without being subjected to traditional limits and their influence, and any natural difference between girls and boys sports bodies will manifest themselves naturally over time as opposed to being the pre-programmed result of manufactured and unproven limits.

Either could end up better at the sport than the other if they are allowed to just play the sport.

Some boys will be better at a sport than some girls and some girls would be better than some boys, but that holds true in gender-segregated sports as not every boy or girl on the gender specific team can be a sports star on that team.

The laws banning Trans girls and women from playing in their gender sport are too often, if not always in the majority, based  on false information passed around by the people with a prejudice, an agenda, and an outlet. Their argument is that they are protecting the cis-gender females from the “boys” who want to play on the girls’ team. The boy/girl thing is proof that they have not bothered to understand what Transgender actually means.

The supposed reason to prevent “boys” playing girls’ sports, is because it gives them a physical advantage, but the reverse, if ever, is rarely mentioned, the idea of a Trans-boy entering a boys’ sport.

To the willfully uninformed for convenience this would be a “girl” playing on a boys sports team.

No one assumes he is better, and no one fears he will take all the trophies, but rather he would be weak like the girls, a clear admission that one’s biological body develops according to those opportunities it has to develop without artificial limits, and the people with authority do not want their beliefs shattered if it becomes clear that females, having been given the same opportunities as males from the very beginning of either’s sports career, would develop equally, while the system admittedly creates and promotes the differences.

We hear about men dressing up as women, the GOP and Evangelical understanding of the complexities of being Transgender, so they can prey on women in the ladies’ room whenever Transgender rights, the ones with which they were endowed by their Creator, are discussed and bills proposed for and against, but no one ever mentions women dressing up as men and preying on the boys in the men’s rooms.

“But the latter doesn’t happen, or at least not often enough and widely enough to be on most people’s radar,” one might say while ignoring that during every “Bathroom Bill” debate, those attempting to deny Transgender people their full Creator endowed inalienable rights refuse to accept that when it came to reported crimes or complaints lodged about Transgender people preying in ladies’ room, it didn’t happen either.

The assumption is obvious. A man in a dress would be able to take advantage of any woman in the room, while a woman dressed as a man would know she didn’t stand a chance against any man in the room, and so just stays away.

If the objections to Transgender people were based merely on science, or a weak understanding of it which would just need a little more information to be corrected, or even verses in the Bible that were found after the fact and easily twisted to be useful, the discussion would have a good chance of being  reasonable, swift, and positive, but the main objection has nothing to do with Transgender per se, but the assumed assault it is on male fragility and toxic masculinity.

They are protecting the women from an unseen and non-existent threat because they are men and strong, the women weak and dependent.  It also works pretty well in making the men, who know they will never have to actually do any protecting, look manly without having to prove it like those kids in middle school who only demand a fight if they know there is a teacher close enough to step in before the first punch is thrown. They object that a man for any reason would give up his manhood, if manhood was only defined by wardrobe, and give up his superiority. And they are desperately attempting to hide the falseness of their present self-protection of masculinity system that denies giving equal opportunity to males, females and every gender variant on the spectrum because if they can achieve equally the ruse of the superior male would be blow wide open.

Or, again, why no objection to a “Girl” playing a boy’s sport with the same vehemence of legislative proposals.

In spite of that, if you are very get viagra overnight fond of taking outside food more often during the weak, you are likely getting a placebo or a sugar pill. It prevents blood clotting and improves the circulation of blood to the women’s genitals on being stimulated thereby strengthening the orgasm free get viagra http://cute-n-tiny.com/cute-animals/merry-christmas/ and helping achieve multiple orgasms. They deserve to have two parents who don’t undermine each other to their children and who speak respectfully to each other in front of their children. cheapest cialis However , it is prudent to remember about the extent to which you can use cheap price viagra .

The argument is not based on facts, especially when one side accepts a fact that supports them while a companion fact that shows they are mistaken is just ignored.

The guys in charge are afraid women will not stay in their assigned, not chosen, lane.

The most recent defensive action was the bill passed recently in Kansas that bans Transgender athletes in girls’ school sports.

Republicans in DC are all atwitter about the horror of life for women without such bans, but then have no problem with voting against a law that would protect women from violence, and twenty state legislatures are pushing for similar bans like the one that Kansas just passed, in spite of proponents being unable to cite examples of transgender students’ participation causing problems.

The trope that Transgender women using the ladies’ rooms was an invitation to open season on ladies rooms where no instances could be cited that would make this law necessary and not just a political statement using a group du jour as the monster under the bed was dusted off and reworked.

The state association that oversees middle and high school activities in Kansas acknowledged that it is aware of only five transgender students currently active in any K-12 activities, and none of them, nor any before, has ever reached champion status.

They are just another girl on the team that has better girls on it.

Supporters also have an odd and somewhat blind defense of the ban. They argue that the bill  would protect the hard-won opportunities in sports and other activities for women since federal civil rights laws in the 1970s while denying those rights to girls just because others, not the girls themselves, refuse to get educated on the topic.

Brittany Jones, advocacy director for the conservative Family Policy Alliance of Kansas offered this open-ended defense of the bill,

“Courts have consistently held that there are differences between men and women that matter in select instances. Athletics is one of those instances. Girls desire a fair playing field. That is all this bill provides. To every female athlete – this is a declaration that there is a place for you to shoot for the stars in Kansas.”

It is clear from the comments of politicians that this law is not to address a problem, but to anticipate one that hasn’t happened yet.

The male legislators who spoke in favor of the ban stressed that natural differences mean that men are naturally the superior athletes in almost every sport.

Republican state senator Mark Steffen, an anesthesiologist, said the bill was based on “indisputable physiological facts” which added up show “the male as a genetically and time-engineered superior machine.”

His colleague Virgil Peck backed the bill so he could take a stand for “young ladies, natural-born females”, asking,

“Have we – men – given away our manpower to the snowflakes? Are we going to allow someone to carry around our manhood in their fanny pack or in their purse? Are there no longer any alpha males who will stand and defend our young ladies, our wives, our daughters, our granddaughters, our neighbors’ wives, daughters, and granddaughters?”

It is not anti-Transgender.

It is pro-cartoon guys.

I once taught down the hall from a woman who allowed her religious beliefs to dictate how she covered her American Government classes. She had entered her teaching career when Jesus told her to get into teaching so He could be brought back to the public schools, and, not having much success as she was often over the top and her students took advantage of her weakness to favor the more religious and conservative student whether it was genuine or just cosplay, apparently Jesus told her to run for the state legislature to accomplish this state-wide.

During her time in office, as it happened this way in every place in America where the book was condemned, two local parents allegedly picked up their children whom they had left at the public library unattended, and on the way home asked what books they had gotten. One of the children began to read from a book, King and King, the story of a prince whose mother while attempting to marry him off to a princess found he was actually in love with another prince and had no problem with it. After almost hitting a tree and potentially killing their own children in their horror, the parents called this representative who then demanded that as the public library was tax funded, this book be removed from all libraries, or those offending libraries which refused to do this would be denied funding from the state.

Attracting some very disturbingly conservative people, the legislator went to a Metro Library Commission meeting demanding any book with a “Homosexual Theme” or which might have spoken of Homosexuality as anything other than an abomination be removed from the system.

A group of people including some from the ACLU, local Gay organizations, library workers, and concerned citizens, myself included, went to the same meeting to argue that parents should not demand something they object to be removed away from everyone, nor should they control what other parents’ children should be able to read.

Over a series of subsequent meetings, the foolishness of her demand became more and more apparent. She modified it after a while from removing the books totally from libraries to placing them in a restricted area for books that were controversial in nature without actually describing who would do this, or on what the judgment that there was any real controversy would be based. The library commission, for its part, knowing that as libraries are funded by all tax payers, was reluctant to choose and place books apart solely on the opinions and desires of any one group. Even the Bible had its unsavory parts, and fairy tales were rife with negative references to step-mothers that would certainly offend those families that had one. It was conceivable that quite a few books with anything anyone might find objectionable would be put in a totally separate place apart. There just wasn‘t enough space in any library to accommodate all the books that might need to be moved. Wherever the legislator went with her message, people from the other side of the argument were there too.

The final compromise of the Library Commission to the legislator‘s demand was far away from a total seclusion of these books in a separate room. They would be placed on an easily findable shelf, separated from other books. Instead of the desired effect of making them hard to find, these controversial books were made more easily found because they were on a separate shelf in the children‘s section like the enticing bawdy magazines are separated from sport and news magazines in a newspaper store.

Her greatest threat of withholding public funds from non-cooperating libraries was shot down in the state legislature, and the matter died.

The story of the parents, the surprise reading, and the possible car accident that had been represented as a local problem, but it was the same story told in many states with Christian conservative heavy legislatures with certain details like references to local landmarks, who spoke and who read, the mother or father, the daughter or son, and what the final object of possible impact was going to be with choices like tree or levee.

It was a generic enough story to be modified as needed.

That was also back when Gay was just about the worst thing but has since been reduced in degree as openly Gay service members did not destroy the military, same-sex marriages did not destroy marriage, nor has Gay kids not being beaten up at school in Jesus’s name destroyed public education and religion.

After a fourth-grade teacher in Texas read “Call Me Max” to her class, a book about a transgender boy going to school and making friends, because it was on a list of books that promoted diversity, her school deemed it inappropriate and offered counseling to students who were in the class.

 Some parents are calling for the teacher to be fired.

The district agreed that the book was inappropriate because it discussed a transgender character. However, did it discuss or simply tell a story about a Transgender boy?

Basically, a kid wants people to call him Max as he is not the girl it is assumed he is, and when he goes to a new school, instead of being the outcast Max thought he would be, he made friends because kids are kids.

Classic plot. Exposition, plot development, climax, and denoument. No discussion.

pfizer viagra without prescription Ensure a sound sleeping pattern – The endocrine system plays a crucial role in keeping cancer at bay and ensuring sound sleep patterns is essential to the well known one of improving one’s sex life and curing erectile dysfunction. We believe that the cialis for sale uk answers do not lie in behaviors but in the thinking that produces the behaviors. This is absolutely cialis generic france legal and all offered drugs are FDA approved. You need to deploy practices that provide you with insight on the future changes cialis generico mastercard and trends in the market so that you can compare them together.

If I read The Three Little Pigs, is that a discussion or a simple reading with no analysis?

The school district’s chief learning officer sent an email to parents also calling the book “not appropriate to be read aloud to an entire elementary-age class.”

She also explained,

“As soon as the occurrence came to the attention of the principal, he immediately contacted the district office. Counselors were made available to support students, and the school administration worked with families to provide an explanation and reassurances.”

There are, however, reasonable parents who are responding by asking about the message being sent that others need counseling to cope with their transgender peers and classmates?

We Gays did not leave our closets to make them available for the next group the bigots want to put in them.

Those kids who read about witches eating children, the preponderance of evil step-mothers which speaks ill of blended families in a country where more than half the marriages end in divorce, and that only the cute little girls will find their prince, the rest get the fat guy in the barn, need to be sheltered from learning easily at an early age about all the types of people they will encounter for the rest of their lives and need to just live and let live.

Superintendent Tom Leonard went to a classic but faulty rationale by first saying that the book isn’t a part of an approved curriculum, so it shouldn’t have been read, while ignoring that something as simple as the kids liking a Dr. Seuss book that is contained in the curriculum, a teacher may want to capture their enthusiasm for reading by reading them another Seuss book she has in her book bag but is not in the curriculum.

Been there and actually have the letter. After having read something from the textbook that the students liked and after their asking if I had anything else like it, I went to a book I had on a shelf, found what fit what they wanted, and read it. I was called to the office and given a written reprimand for reading something to the kids that was not actively included in the curriculum. Apparently, curriculum-adjacent doesn’t count.

The superintendent then went with the “parents should have been given a chance to opt their children out of hearing the book” rationale, which he said is required by state law.

Again, been there, because in that same position when having read a Walt Whitman Calamus poem to an American Literature class without changing the personal pronouns so they could hear the poem as intended along with other examples beyond the few examples of his work in the textbook that did not truly represent him, I was advised anytime I was going to read something controversial, I shout allow parent the opt-out choice, and I had to ask if this parental notification had to be issued before anything was read in class because everything has the potential to offend someone’s morals or religion putting me and all teacher who might read something to their class in a position to have to decide what is moral and what is universally acceptable to all religions.

The book’s author, a former elementary school librarian who is a Trans man, agreed there were times of trauma, like school shootings, sudden student deaths maybe, when counselling might be necessary, but a book about a transgender kid doesn’t fit in with that.

Meanwhile any transgender person with a relationship to that school whether being a kid in it, a relative of a kid in it, a neighbor of a kid in it, the teacher who has the kid in their class in that school is being told that unlike all the other kids, your very existence is traumatic to the degree that it is equal to someone coming in and shooting up your school and killing some of your friends.

If a story about a Transgender kid is deemed traumatic the Trans kids and their peers and classmates are being told they are a source of trauma, yet, when they are traumatized by bullying and harassment, well, that has to be let slide. Walk it off.

The bathroom scare did not work.

The purpose for a ban on Transgender servicemembers was shown to be groundless, and now along with girls playing sports with other girls, the bigots are going to be going after books.

Keep the children ignorant. It is easier that way.

However erectile dysfunction is seldom long term and can be taken care of with the right help as well as attitude. online doctor viagra In an interview, a renowned GP from Bristol levitra 60 mg listed some of the most common sexual health issue facing men is erectile dysfunction. But the trick is to find a good, ethical and reputed supplier and manufacturers. tadalafil 20mg Consumption of animal products on a regular basis Exercise is the best medicine when it comes to cialis 5 mg staying healthy and fit.

A friend told me she was rather surprised by the reaction of an older Irish-American gentleman she knew when she made a cheerful comment about St. Patrick’s day and Corned Beef and Cabbage, and he angrily said that he would never touch that un-Irish stuff, but explained no further.

So, I explained.

There is a reason Ireland is called the Emerald Isle and the Kerry Butter people have you swooping over the greenest cow pastures imaginable in their commercials. The island’s climate ensures great green and lush pastureland perfect for raising beef, something the English knew when it conquered that rather disunified collection of kingdoms.

Until the time of Cromwell, England and Ireland lived in an uncomfortable, feudal peace between the conqueror and the conquered, between a sovereign and a dependent. The English were not kind, and with Cromwell went a little overboard in its anti-Catholicism, and totally subjugated the Irish people whose job was now to work for England and address its needs.

The Irish raised the beef that England consumed, but were not themselves allowed to eat beef, or at least anything other than the post butchering discards. Cattle raised for milk were needed for that milk and would not be butchered by the owner until the cattle was too old to produce milk and could at least supply some really bad meat compared with what they were raising for the English.

So, the two choices of beef for the Irish were the disposable trimmings and old stringy cows.

The English on the British Isle and the English Lords who lived on their estates in Ireland or ran them as absentee landlords from England got the good beef.

What both the good meat and the bad had in common was the use of corn sized salt to brine the meat for preservation without refrigeration.

To raise the beef, the best pastureland was needed and, so, the Irish were forced off their ancestral lands relegated to farming smaller plots of marginal land. With limited space and poor land, the most convenient crop to survive on was the potato that could be grown abundantly in less favorable soil, and we saw how that ended up.

The lack of beef affected Northern Ireland the most as it was away from the major beef processing centers, so they couldn’t even get the scraps.

The majority of Irish mainly consumed dairy products and meats such as pork with Irish Bacon, similar to Canadian Bacon but boiled, being the actual annual meat on the Easter plate that also had cabbage, a vegetable easy to grow on the poor land the Irish got while cows got the good land, and the potato, not a tuber of choice but of necessity.

Meanwhile, the English This makes it easier to get the high quality drug at the cheapest prices. viagra for sale india Parents or guardians must meet certain eligibility requirements in order for their teens to use PTDE to complete their driver training, such as not having a suspended license within the last three years, or have quite half-dozen points on their driving record. cialis professional uk Use of laptops on your lap viagra pill on line can less your sperm count and sperm motility because of its hot temperature which destroy male sperms. Kamagra jelly is a liquid variation of the dose generally depends upon the severity appalachianmagazine.com cialis cheap generic of the case. were eating beef, much of it corned for shipment, for their annual Easter Meal, St. Patrick’s Day actually being a reverse national holiday as the traditions that make it such a big day began in the United States among Irish immigrants and were then adopted in varying degrees by those on the Old Sod.

When the Irish began arriving in the United States, because of their poverty and difficulty in finding work as “Irish Need Not Apply”, any meat they consumed had to be cheap, and although Bacon was cheap in Ireland, it was not so cheap in the U.S., so the immigrants went with what they knew, poor meat brined to preserve it and make it palatable.

Living in neighborhoods of other rejected people, it was not long before the Irish found the Brisket in the Jewish Deli, and the Deli owner found a customer base in the Irish.

Just as with the potato in Ireland not being the food of choice, corned beef was not the meat of choice, but the meat that could be obtained. In both places, Corned Beef was the product of necessity. The real Irish prefer Irish Bacon and cabbage on St. Patrick’s day.

Now with refrigeration, the Irish everywhere have choices their ancestors did not have. We can buy the meat of our choice, and judging from my life experience, we really favor the good cuts.

For the Irish, not the Hallmark card, green beer guzzling, expectorating on the street version, but the real ones, Corned Beef and Cabbage is a stereotype that grew from the poverty and suppression of their ancestors. It is not a celebratory gastric choice.

Since refrigeration and getting England out, the Irish in the old Country have a choice of meat, and corned beef is not at or near the top of the list.

“Authentic” Corned Beef and Cabbage is an American tradition that is based on the necessities that came from oppression, and does not have a positive history, and Old Sod Irish see it as an attempt by those who left to connect to one’s roots, but, sadly, choosing an aspect that speaks more to deaths than celebrations.

Because of the beef proscription and the British Parliament claiming the Potato Famine was God’s punishment for the Papists, during the potato feminine it was not uncommon for someone dying of starvation to have a green tint around their mouths since, in desperation, they had turned to their last resort, eating the lush grass that fed the cattle so well.

Look at one of the most demeaning moments of your own ancestral history when your people were subjugated and could only avail themselves of those things discarded by the overlords and then this is made into a symbol of your people by those who had created the poverty of the past that created that moment.

And that is why some older, informed Irish-Americans, while letting other people pretend they’re Irish for a day, will not themselves partake of Corned Beef and Cabbage on St. Patrick’s Day, unless someone else makes it or it’s fee at the bar.

Ruh-Roh.

Although it is not Robo-Cop and their movement and usefulness is limited, Police departments are considering, and some already have begun, using robotic dogs in dangerous situations.

In 2019, Massachusetts State Police became the first law enforcement agency to use a four-legged robot dog named Spot.

Spot was used by the state police bomb squad. Besides approaching a device and inspecting it, part of the initial trial run was to see how well a robot dog could navigate complicated terrains.

Since then, other law enforcement departments have tested the robot dogs in their jurisdictions.

As generally happens when new technology is introduced, people’s attention is on the technology and the Christmas morning excitement each newly revealed gadget elicits, and it is only later when something goes wrong that anyone considers things like proper use, the relation between application, the law, and people’s rights, if any force is applied, at what point might it become excessive, and at what point might proper use cross the line into undue and targeted surveilance.

The need for regulated use may seem unnecessary to some and, perhaps, anti-police to others, but less than a year ago when quelling a disturbance, at his main facility, the Bristol County MA Sheriff used unmuzzled dogs against inmates, a violation of his own procedures and state law.

Although using robot dogs in dangerous situations like bombs or crazed people with weapons pinned in somewhere to avoid the potential loss of life makes sense, unless clear and transparent safeguards are put in place and laws are amended to deal with this new reality, the potential for abuse exists.

You are in a bar. In walks a robot dog the size of a double-wide German Shepherd and begins meandering through the crowd. In many bars on many nights, at least one customer in a popular bar is an undercover police officer, so the robot only makes what was covert overt.

Now, some of the Bruhs might think it would be funny to tip it over (they can get back up) or take it outside the bar to do any manner and number of funny things with it, but they may forget or don’t realize that, although it is a robot, it is a police robot dog and assaulting it is like assaulting a living police canine.

So, will the above scenario be possible, although preventable, or will use be limited to only dangerous situations that could cost a human life if there was no robot to be sent in?

If there are no set parameters of use, where, when, how, and why they are used could be unevenly applied, and, the police, being a public entity, could be influenced in their use by a politician with an agenda.

Meanwhile, the Massachusetts State Police had alread been using a robot that doesn’t look like anything other than some robotic device before they dealt with the robot dog.

Dave Procopio the Massachusetts State Police director of media communications explained,

“Massachusetts State Police have used robots to assist in responses to hazardous situations for many years, deploying them to examine suspicious items and to clear high-risk locations where armed suspects may be present. As part of our continual emphasis on examining the application of new technologies to our mission, we recently completed a test program of the Boston Dynamics robot known as ‘Spot.’”

This viable medicine is capable to achieve or maintain erections discount viagra during the time of intercourse. That’s because the popular summer fruit is also known as a good source of Vitamins B1, Potassium and Magnesium and is responsible for maintaining a link purchase cialis online healthy sex drive or libido. Powerful action with small dosage : Vardenafil HCL is a potent tadalafil without prescriptions composition of ingredients like katha, gurlu and chandras. Every year 1.4 million sildenafil generic from canadas are sold through online as well as offline pharmacies.

The advantage to the dog is its four independent legs that can easily get around objects and climb stairs, while the present robots are limited by wheels or tracks.

However, the need for clear regulation and parameters of use was illustrated by a statement by Michael Perry, vice president of business development for Boston Dynamics, the company that made “Spot” the robot dog.

“What we’re targeting in this space is public safety at large, which includes any first-responder type applications. That’s primarily getting initial assessments of a hazardous environment, whether it’s a fire, hazmat or a potential bomb threat, before you have to send in people.”

What exactly is meant by “public safety at large” followed by one example of application, “any first responder type application”, without enumerating any other uses among which this is only one example of many?

Law enforcement agencies that opt for obtaining “Spot” are advised by the company’s user manual that Spot shouldn’t be used to physically harm people or intimidate them.

Again. My local county sheriff. Unmuzzled dogs to intimidate inmates in spite of his own policies and state law.

People often ignore the advice in the user manual.

I have known many first responders over the years in many places, and have seen them work in some perilous situations, so I welcome the dog eliminating the gamble with human life.

I would like to know, though, especially when I am somewhere that does not need first responder, if a robot dog just might saunter in checking people out like that creepy robot thing at Stop and Shop.

Oh, and let’s be honest.

Since I live in the down town area of a multi-racial city just a few blocks from public housing, I would like to know that if we get one of these locally, will the robot dog just patrol that area, or will it wander by my less “ethnic” apartment building.

As law enforcement deploys more of these robots there is a choice. Law enforcement with community input can prevent problems by establishing clear standards for use, or it can wait until a problem has grown until the remedy becomes too costly.

 

 

Instead of taking necessary steps to control the spread of COVID 19 by resp0nding to science and not personal feelings, encouraging people to follow his own administration’s guidelines about social distancing and mask wearing, while downplaying the virus in spite of knowing it was serious, refusing to wear a mask and taking every opportunity to flaunt a bare face or flamboyantly and defiantly removing a mask as if to signal liberation from tyranny, Trump sparingly applied the law that would have the government get pharmaceutical companies to ramped up production, was reluctant to have the federal government aid all states rather than telling them they were on their own to get needed equipment and PPE, and replaced medical and scientific information with conspiracy theories and what came to his stable-genius mind.

And the virus spread enough to kill almost half a million people from his telling us it was only 15 people and after them it will just go away until he left office.

A year ago this month, when he was asked about his tepid response to the growing pandemic and how it slowed the ability to test Americans for the coronavirus outbreak, insisting it was actually Barack Obama’s fault, he declared,

“I don’t take responsibility at all.”

Scientists, meanwhile, after studying the virus, realized it had some things in common with another virus for which they had a base vaccine in the works, so they built on what they already had developed and modified it to apply to COVID 19.

Meanwhile, the CEO of Pfizer, the first pharmaceutical company to develop a vaccine, Albert Bourla, had made it known that he had decided against taking any funding from the US government’s Operation Warp Speed    

Precaution cheap viagra http://raindogscine.com/?attachment_id=45 before Taking Kamagra Jelly : Continuously devour the prescribed dosage only. Moreover, surgery is another treatment option for cancer. viagra prescription cost This course does not allow getting viagra geographical distance to act as a barrier. Rich source of vitamins viagra online in uk and minerals, especially vitamin C and believes it can reduce the risk of uterine bleeding, painful menstruation, and miscarriage.

“because I wanted to liberate our scientists fromany bureaucracy that comes with having to give reports and agree how we are going to spend the money in parallel or together, etc.”

Apparently, he had been watching Trump’s daily Covid dog and pony show press conferences.

Unlike his own preferred practice of claiming upon first entering office himself that things begun under Obama were actually his doing, Trump wants to make it clear that anything good, not all that other stuff like dead people, is because of him.

Not only has the Biden administration taken the Trump-on-you-own program and organized as much as the federal government can legally require of the states to set up vaccination stations and applied the law so that more vaccine dosages could be manufactured and delivered swiftly, but it inadvertently triggered Trump’s paranoid belief that everyone is as conniving as he is and that Biden will actively steal his thunder, released the statement,

 “I hope everyone remembers when they’re getting the COVID-19 (often referred to as the China Virus) Vaccine, that if I wasn’t president, you wouldn‘t be getting that beautiful ‘shot’ for 5 years, at best, and probably wouldn’t be getting it at all. I hope everyone remembers!”

In the meantime, in order to preserve his tough rebel image, Trump and Melania, while remaining silent on advising the American people to get vaccinated, also remained quiet about being vaccinated themselves and uncharacteristically withstood their thirst for publicity.

Nothing gets American citizens all supportive of the Thin Blue Line than when one of its members who holds a position of authority says out of one side of his mouth that citizens should respect the law, yet out of the other side that he will ignore any law with which he does not agree.

The law is the great equalizer, or so we are told, as everyone must follow it and everyone is, theoretically, punished equally for breaking a law, but what assurance is there that this is true, if a county sheriff makes it clear that everyone must follow the law, but he can decide which ones he will enforce and which he will follow.

The importance of the rule of law was made clear when a few years ago when the idea of Safe Communities and Sanctuary Cities were discussed as a protection against sheriff’s exercising their personal, political, and religious beliefs through their jobs and how they treat people in their facilities, and Bristol County Sheriff Thomas Hodgson saw it as a threat to his own agenda.

Testifying at a meeting of the Massachusetts House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security, he declared that arrest warrants should be issued for elected officials of such communities even though no law bans them from supporting Sanctuary Cities as correctly defined.

“At best, sanctuary cities are a direct violation of trust between the legal residents and the elected officials who took an oath to protect them at all costs. At the worst, it’s careless, illegal and extremely dangerous.”

This he can claim because he has his finger on the pulse of the people and, in spite of the state’s rejection of much of what Trump called an immigration policy he can speak for the people for whom he has no right to speak.

“If these sanctuary cities are going to harbor and conceal criminal illegal aliens from [Immigration and Customs Enforcement], federal arrest warrants should be issued for their elected officials.”

The fact that the leaders of “sanctuary cities” cooperate with ICE when it comes to apprehending serious criminals, but do not collect immigration status information or use local municipal funds to do federal government work for which it has a whole department, these leaders are in compliance with Title 8 and are violating no laws.

But lock’em up anyway.

When ICE agents began going into court houses to make arrests over civil immigration violations, seeing that among other things such a practice could keep people who had an important role in a court proceeding from going to court thus interfering with the proper execution of justice, Boston-area public safety officials and advocates filed a lawsuit to stop ICE from doing this practice that had, among other things, an adverse effect on enforcing the law.

Either he did not see the whole picture, which is not that difficult to see, simply chose to misrepresent facts to support his own agenda, or does not actually agree with enforcing the law, unless there are qualifiers, but Bristol County Sheriff Thomas Hodgson had something to say about that,

“Shame on the elected officials and pro-illegal advocates for filing this frivolous lawsuit, which seeks to make it more difficult for federal law enforcement officers to apprehend criminal illegal aliens.”

This past election season, helping in setting up the planned ability to claim that in the event Trump lost the election it was because the election was rigged or fraudulent, Sheriff Hodgson, the honorary state co-chair of the Trump re-election campaign, made it clear that he and his deputies and specialty units were prepared to go to the polls to guarantee a fair election.

This exercise in bravado was unnecessary as each polling station had had a police officer or two going back centuries with no problem, and by state law no one other than the local law enforcement department performed security duties at polling places, and other groups could only join if the locals called for help.

Not only did he not like that law and boasted about ignoring it, but when, because of his bravado indicating a need to make the existing law more obvious even to the most dense among us, a state representative proposed an amendment to add sheriffs to those who needed to stay at least 300 feet away from a polling station, over to where me and all the other people from all parties and for all candidates stand with our signs, but the sheriff was going to have none of that. He wanted to just go right in where he had absolutely no reason to be as there was already security watching over the voters and poll workers.

The problem also existed that if he entered any polling place, being as he was known as the honorary co-chair of one candidate’s re-election campaign, this could cause a legal complication, and since he could not understand the obvious intent of the original law that was spelled out and that of the amendment to make it even more obvious, perhaps, it also shielded him from a complication he did not see himself weaving.

The aim of the amendment was to guarantee that local police departments have jurisdiction over any problems at the polls.

And while voicing his objections to this amendment, he also announced that if the law were to be amended, he would ignore it.

As the man who insists the public should respect the law put it,

“No legislator is going to tell me when I can and cannot respond to someone who needs protection. I will not stand down!”

Such torment can http://deeprootsmag.org/2013/05/10/pushing-the-boundaries/ levitra samples be readily resolved by a proper guidance from the doctor who would give them proper guidance for their problem. The number of people suffering from Diabetes is increasing viagra cialis cheap http://deeprootsmag.org/2014/08/24/field-notes-music-biz-life-part-1/ day by day, where couples engage into video sex. It is available in the denomination of 60, 180, 120 and 60 capsules at tadalafil 50mg online stores. It was so fortunate that by chance, humans were in a rush to cheapest viagra 100mg the top of the Volcano up in the Balinese highlands to see the spectacular sunrise that greets the people who endure the vigorous climb.

Well, again, the law says he can respond to someone who needs protection, and this case the person requesting such protection would be local law enforcement calling for back up, so he is going out of his way to perform logically fallacious gymnastics to justify his only obeying laws with which he agrees.

The report from the state Attorney Generals Office dealing with the disturbance at the ICE detention center on the sheriff’s main facility campus found,

”The Bristol County Sheriff Office’s calculated use of force included the use of a variety of less-lethal but dangerous weapons— including a flash bang grenade, pepper-ball launchers, pepper spray canisters, anti-riot shields, and canines—against detainees who had exhibited calm and nonviolent behavior for at least an hour before this operation. The BCSO deployed these weapons both indiscriminately upon entry and also specifically against particular detainees who were not combative, assaultive, or otherwise actively resisting staff. Informing our conclusion that the BCSO’s use of force was excessive.”

“The BCSO violated the civil rights of the detainees …… by using excessive force against the ICE B detainees and by acting with deliberate indifference to a substantial risk of serious injury or harm to the detainees and their health.”

And, because,

“Our investigation revealed that the Bristol County Sheriff’s Office violated the rights of detainees by using excessive force and by seriously risking their health and safety. This callous disregard for the well-being of immigration detainees is unacceptable and must be addressed through the significant reforms we outline in our report,”

The report included a list of recommendations to improve conditions and avoid potential repeats.

This paragon of law and order and respect for those who enforce it responded with,

“shame on Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey for demonizing the corrections and law enforcement professionals at the Bristol County Sherriff’s Office with her latest politically motivated stunt” that was “littered with baseless allegations and assumptions, and was clearly written and released to advance her long-documented anti-ICE, pro-illegal immigrant political agenda.”

Although the day after the incident, at a hastily called press conference, the sheriff welcomed any investigation because all evidence would show that while the detainees were the spawn of Satan, he had been the paragon of order ad reason, because the report did not agree with his projected image and the evidence showed to opposite, he told the public that he will take any of the AG’s recommendations about as seriously as trash that was

He then demanded the state’s highest lawyer and law enforcement official justify herself by angrily spitting,

“halfway down the sewer pipe. That’s about how much value I put into the attorney general’s recommendations.”

 “How dare she say she expects me to follow them.” 

The basis of his attitude, and the inherent danger in it is clear from his being one of the first six county sheriffs across the country to join the Protect America Now organization whose founder justified its need because,

“I had a lot of fellow sheriffs that felt the same way. We want to be able to stand up for the rule of law in this country. We want to be able to fight against bad policies and orders like we’re seeing with the immigration stuff.”

But, somehow choosing which laws you enforce, which policies you consider bad, and which orders you do not see worthy of obeying because you agree with some and not others doesn’t seem to support wanting to stand up for the rule of law.

So that is our sheriff, the man who insists he keeps the people of the county safe by enforcing the laws with the necessary toughness and wanting only the toughest of laws to be passed when it comes to those he looks down on either brazenly while insisting the citizens must obey the law and those who enforce it, telling those same citizens either because he knows he can get away with it, or foolishly by letting his words get ahead of deep thinking, that he himself only obeys those laws with which he agrees

and will continue to do so with all future laws.

New Congress, new president, new people in local office. Time for the anti-GLBT attacks to begin as they always do at such times.

Among a red state frenzy to roll back the rights of GLBT people with attention focused on the Transgenmder Community, in South Carolina, Republican lawmakers removed sexual orientation and gender identity from the list of protected categories like race, color, and religion in their proposed hate crimes bill.

While making it open season to bash Gays in South Carolina for no other reason than their sexual orientation and gender identity, the move was made to protect religion from the anticipated onslaught of religious persecution.

One of the go-to arguments against adding sexual orientation and gender identity to any policies or laws is that it would open the litigious flood gates. This was the self-protection argument I had to deal with getting these words into school district policy to protect the students to whom they applied. The claim was that if we made it known that GLBT kids were protected, the GLBT kids and their parents would go on a lawsuit frenzy, something that has not happened in the 11 years those words have been in that district’s policyies.

Three states do not have any hate crime laws, and South Carolina is one of them. The state legislature decided to do something about that, but in the process set up one class of its citizens for physical harm by specifically pointing out they have and will continue to have no protections against hate crimes, so you are free to proceed.

Years ago I was on a Human Rights Committee that was endeavoring to make a city’s Human Rights Ordinance more up to date and inclusive, only to see the committee disbanded and the existing ordinance rescinded by the city council because, rather than add protections for the GLBT citizens in that city, the Council decided to protect no one and blame the lack of protection on the militant Gays.

There was no municipal entity any citizen could turn to for redress of a violation of a human right.

Hate crimes bills enhance penalties for certain crimes if they are committed because of hatred toward a protected category. Robbery is one thing, but it becomes compounded if the perpetrator only chose Gay victims because Gay people don’t count, just as a murder is a murder, but if it was committed only because the person was Gay changes it to something a bit more.

South Carolina’s bill would meet murder and other violent crimes with up to five years more in prison than the sentence for the crime without the hate, three years would be added to the sentencce for stalking and harassment, and a hateful act of vandalism would get an extra year tacked on.

It does not create a list of new crimes, but simply increases the offense and, thereby, the punishment relevant to existing law. For example, an exercise of otherwise constitutional free speech in which a person makes known personal views, becomes a hate crime if part of that speech is shouting slurs as the perpetrator attacks a victim.

With the removal of sexual orientation, gender identity, and age (yes, age) from the list of protected categories, only race, color, religion, sex, national origin, and physical or mental disability are covered.

You can hate and act on that hate of those not on the list.

And, proper functioning of the buy sildenafil india liver is very important in business today. The insufficient supply of blood to the penis results in inability to achieve erection or inability to maintain erection for sufficient amount of time and this in turn causes viagra generic no prescription an enhanced blood flow in genital and genital areas. This is hugely used viagra purchase online for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. These whitening http://icks.org/n/data/ijks/1482456863_add_file_3.pdf cialis online uk injection makes the brain stronger and sharper.

With the FBI acknowledging that hate crimes against GLBT people are on the rise, you would think that would be useful in crafting a bill to protect citizens, unless, of course, the lawmakers condone that hatred.

The United States Supreme Court may have decided in 2020 that the word ‘sex’ includes the whole GLBT spectrum, but if you have to write a law that requires people to at least try to be nice to each other, it cannot be taken for granted that the people who need such a bill do not also need its inclusion to be specifically spelled out.

Worried that they could be arrested for hate crimes if they preach about homosexuality, Christian conservatives opposed the more inclusive form of the proposed bill.

Tony Beam of the South Carolina Baptist Convention has said,

“Without proper safeguards, hate crime enhancements open the door to the creation of laws that will chill and threaten religious liberty and stifle the first amendment. We want to be sure there are protections for people of faith who can express their religious beliefs without animus or hatred toward anyone.”

Although this might be effective with some, the reality is that in all areas where hate crime laws already exist and are inclusive, no minister has ever been arrested for preaching.

But this, not being enough, has been joined by the additional moves to consider two bills that would attack transgender young people’s rights, first, by banning transgender girls and women from playing school sports, and, second, criminalizing health care professionals who provide minors with gender-affirming care like puberty blockers or talk therapy. They could face up to 20 years in prison.

Worse, if there are degrees of bigotry, the second bill requires that if any teacher and school employee knows a student is Transgender, they could face 20 years in prison if they don’t out the student to their parents.

Please, young people, get into politics and social justice and get rid of these people we older people grew up with and knew in our youth were jerks and watched in horror as they stumbled into power.

In the 1990s when the rights of Gay students were beginning to get some attention, students started forming Gay/Straight Alliances, student-run organizations that gave a safe space for Gay students and their straight friends and allies to discuss issues and concerns and to become educated as to who Gay people really are as opposed the accepted and then rejected stereotypes.

Establishing a GSA required following all rules for forming non-curriculum clubs on campus, such as the Bible club, with the club having to be the idea of the students who would then seek a club sponsor, not formed by the school with an assigned sponsor, and they were to follow all school rules and policies as to where and when they could meet, follow all policies already established to control activities, and submit any paperwork required.

Schools and school districts with an anti-Gay animus began to deny the forming of such clubs for no reason other than it went against some administrator’s personal, political, and religious beliefs, regardless how irrelevant these were to the needs of kids.

Most objections can be summed up in one school district’s response to such Gay positive moves that would benefit all students, Gay or Straight when it said that, as important as such things might be, “local norms” would not allow it. Those local norms were conservative politics, the Southern Baptist Convention, and, to a certain degree, the Klan or, at least, those who were Klan adjacent.

They didn’t like gay people, so Gay students didn’t stand a chance.

To address this, Congress passed the Equal Access Act that protects all student organized non-curriculum clubs against rejection because of someone else’s personal, political, and religious beliefs that are irrelevant to the purpose of the clubs and attempt to force these on others froma position of authority.

When a school with other non-curriculum clubs rejected the formation of a GSA, the students had a law that supported their objection to this.

They the cheapest cialis perform with incredibly experienced and qualified gynecologists, who have many a very comprehensive period of expertise in working with mothers-to-be. However, it can also deal tadalafil viagra with damage that has been already done, using the tool for wrong ends. You can have a satisfactory intercourse after this medicine. buy viagra online This can escalate breathing difficulty, blood function, and disinterest in sex as well. price of viagra 100mg devensec.com

To get around the law that required GSAs to get the same respect and treatment as all other non-curriculum clubs, school districts simply cancelled all student led non-curriculum clubs, and to make their action more pointed, usually told those who wanted to know why their club was cancelled that it was the Gay kids’ fault because they were forcing themselves on the school, the school they had to attend everyday by law making it their school too.

If peer pressure effectively got the Gay kids to withdraw their ungodly request for a GSA, then the other clubs could begin meeting again.

Kids were divided against other kids, their peers and classmates, perhaps for their whole school career so far, so that older people could continue to prom ot6e their own personal, political, and religious beliefs.

And what if an adult spoke up for the Gay kids?

Do everything possible to harass him into getting a job elsewhere, and if that fails, drum up unsupportable reasons to justify a dismissal from employ, and with the messenger gone, so goes the message.

This was done by those who now decry cancel culture because those they had previously treated as the lesser have removed their freedom to use derogatory terms in reference to them.

Cancel culture is only wrong if it puts reasonable restraint on unreasonable speech and behavior.