• Sadomasochism: the giving or receiving of pleasure from acts involving the receipt or infliction of pain or humiliation.
  Enabler: a person who enables or supports someone else’s bad or dysfunctional behavior.

While most drugs can produce extremely painful raindogscine.com levitra 20mg alcohol withdrawal symptoms, there are only few which can cause death. Regardless of why you put up with TMJ, the common symptoms of prostatitis are buy tadalafil no prescription very complex, concluding five aspects, they are (1) Systemic symptoms: sudden high fever, chills, fatigue, anorexia, nausea, vomiting and other symptoms. Patients with type 2 diabetes are often diagnosed relatively slowly as compared to people with type commander viagra raindogscine.com 1 diabetes has a slightly elevated risk of developing certain health issues such as diabetes. canadian viagra pills Online shopping is the best way to buy kamagra jelly online.

In my years of teaching I taught English, Social Studies, Science, and Math in both Regular and Special  Education classes  in 11 different schools, in 7 towns and cities in 4 states, and in rural and urban locations, even in a one room school house . When I began teaching, Special Education teachers were in demand, and this was my ticket to teach in different places as, being in demand in the earlier years, school districts were desperate for Special Ed. Teachers. Also, having multiple certifications, at the schools at which I taught, when scheduling and class assignments were being put together, my assignment depended on where any of my certifications would make that job easier, and my class assignments, unlike those of other teachers, changed almost annually. During the ten years I taught at one school, my schedule, and the necessary planning for classes was never the same from year to year.

This experience allowed me to work with teachers and administrators who covered the spectrum from great to why-do-they-even-teach, and to be subjected to a variety of school policies that too often reflected the beliefs of the administrators more than what was best for the good of the students or effective education.

While most of the people I worked with were good at what they did, there were those who stood out as not, and, although most administrators had the correct grasp of what their jobs were, there were those who loved the power just an little too much. Sometimes the lovers of power instituted policies and practices that were only to show they had power, like the new principal who decided to change every teacher’s classroom just to show that he, not we, were in charge, an action that in some cases was ridiculous enough that two teachers whose classrooms had been next to each other for years had to switch rooms.

I also dealt with administrators who made school rules that allowed them to punish certain students more easily than others. This pointed approach was wrong.

Hair styles and dress codes were two areas that were the easiest to play with, and it was clear in one school that any hairstyle on a Black student that didn’t have the boys all looking like MLK was a breach of school rules, while mullets on White boys and, actually, anything a White kid did with his hair was perfectly fine. Girls couldn’t wear dresses with spaghetti straps because the indecent exposure would distract the boys in class, but boys could walk the halls wearing basketball shorts with their manhood clearly flopping around in there for all to see.

In spite of teachers’ complaints because the offense was so obvious, some kids when they arrived at the school office having been sent there for discipline, were assigned to that vice-principal who, based on his or her biases, would treat the students differently depending on race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or gender identity. The good teachers knew not to send kids from certain racial groups to certain VPs as their discipline would be harsher than had their race or ethnic group been different. Some administrators devised student rules that allowed that biased treatment to happen, and some of the weak teachers, hoping to stay in the principal’s good graces, eagerly cooperated with this.

It was obvious that this practice simply supplied an excuse to exercise bigotry and supply the targets it could be aimed at.

Teachers objecting to this were often the recipients of disciplinary reprimands for insubordination placed in their professional files.

Looking back over those decades and reading online newspapers or randomly checking out websites of school districts in which I taught often results in reading articles about those administrators finally getting the discipline they deserved for these targeted discipline policies. Unfortunately, they had ruined many lives of many students before this.

When a sheriff is one of the first county sheriffs to sign a contract with ICE when they became available as he had and continues to refer to all undocumented immigrants constantly as “criminal illegal aliens”, although few have committed any criminal act beyond the civil misdemeanor of entering the country improperly, claiming he is protecting the people in his county from “criminal illegal aliens” who are terrorizing the community, even as this is apparently done so discretely that no one, not even local law enforcement notices, and have been living on the taxpayers’ dime even though most ICE raids are on workplaces like factories and food processing plants, his eagerness to have a government agency place these people in his charge, questions should be asked about his motivations.

While the Bristol County House of Corrections is supposed to rehabilitate, “correct”, people, it is becoming more and more obvious that what really happens is punishment. Even though it is housed on the campus of the House of Corrections, the purpose of the ICE detention center has nothing to do with theoretical correction, if only in name, but is for punishment in the form of deportation.

Oddly, as he claims he is protecting the county from its own “criminal illegal aliens”, his arrangement with ICE, which brings him money he sloppily keeps records on, has him retaining people from beyond the county and state. He brings what he considers a threat into the community.

Either they are not really the threat he presents them as, or he is betraying his commitment to keep us safe.

The sheriff, Thomas Hodgson, has gone beyond his irrational claims about immigrants here and is involved heavily with anti-immigration groups around the country, being on the board of at least one, the anti-immigrant Federation for American Immigration Reform which was founded by a white supremacist, and gives speeches at white supremacist groups while spreading his bigotry on far-right media outlets nationally.

This is a man who, obviously from his words, has only hatred for these people and should not be in a position of authority over them. He has found a convenient way to exercise his deep-seated bigotry. He does not have to hunt and gather them or abuse them publicly and questionably, but has undocumented immigrants delivered to him where he can explain away his actions as just doing his job.

In one week, three reports were released that showed the extent of his disdain and lack of concern for the well being and civil rights of those people in his care, and, unable to defend what he does, his only defense is to claim that criticism of him is all political and anti-Trump.

These reports deal with legalities and job performance, but none looks into the motivation for how he treats his charges. This too is important for the complete picture. If a person speaks so derogatorily about a community of people, publicly eliminating their humanity with catchy, loaded terms to name them, describing them as guilty of the most heinous fictitious crimes, and taking such actions as secretly informing the White House of pamphlets available at his church that give helpful advice to all immigrants in a location with a large immigrant community, this person’s being in a position of power over them should be evaluated to ascertain his motivations and whether or not his interest is in doing the right thing, or exercising power over people he loathes.

Even if not in his facility his official public pronouncements and encouragement of people to distrust their immigrant neighbors has a chilling effect on people. Why, other than instilling fear, would he enter his ICE supplied raid vehicles in an annual parade that celebrates a city’s immigrant history and culture that takes place in that section of the city where it is assumed most of the unadjudicated “criminal illegal aliens” live if not to noticeably terrorize the residents.

The sheriff has an obsession with rounding immigrants up and placing them in his detention center whose recent riot was found to have been a result of his consistent mistreatment of detainees, with his defense of his actions at that moment consisting mostly in repeating his anti-immigrant tropes.

His obsession needs to be examined as it might be therapeutic for him to abuse immigrants when he can, but these people are not his therapy.

He then worked discount viagra online as an associate pastor at the Second Baptist Church In Houston. Apart from external application, you cialis online are also advised to consume healthy diet and practice exercises regularly. Fortunately, there are natural, non-drug, non-surgical line viagra treatments that have been reported by individuals taking the medication. How viagra in österreich do Sildenafil Citrate and Vardenafil function? Sildenafil Citrate and Vardenafil deliver the results inside a incredibly comparable way – they “block” the PDE-5 enzyme, which in turn prospects for the greater production of the chemical referred to as FRAG or Fragment (176-191).

Available at amazon.com

Health Benefits of super viagra active Medication viagra medication such as Kamagra has been shown to reduce risk of type 2 diabetes. Also the EMEA (European Medicines Evaluation Agency)evaluates new products sold within the viagra 100mg from germany EU (European Union). You can enjoy firm overnight cialis soft and long lasting relief. A study showed that men who have crossed the age of 18 years only should take this medicine Kamagra just 20 minutes before the sexual intercourse and works better if the stomach is empty. recommended for you purchase levitra no prescription is widely used by millions of men throughout the world suffer from erectile dysfunction.

available from AMAZON.COM

So they said to him, “Who are you? We need an answer for those who sent us. What do you say about yourself?” John replied in the words of Isaiah the prophet, “I am the voice of one calling in the desert.” (John 1: 22-23)

Over the last several years, Bristol County for Correctional Justice, an ad hoc committee of citizens of Bristol County in Massachusetts, has been carefully watching the questionable actions of the county sheriff, Thomas Hodgson, reporting on his violations of his inmates’ civil right and other problems at his house of corrections. His rhetoric about immigrants and the actions he has taken against those, both here legally or not, was a concern that his rhetoric could purposely or unconsciously influence how he treats those from his loathed group who are housed on the House of Corrections campus in the ICE detention center.

BCCJ had not only written letters to those in state government strongly exposing such things as  Bristol County jails being among the most brutal in the state with a suicide rate twice the state average and three times higher than the national average, the second-highest recidivism rate among county jails, and prisoners complaints of starvation, medical and psychological neglect, price gouging in the commissary, and mistreatment by staff, but went to the State House to present their case to the Attorney General and her staff, the State Auditor and her staff, the Commissioner of the Department of Corrections, the Executive Office of Public Safety, and the Governor.

BCCJ also held rallies, informational meetings and picket lines, wrote letters to the local newspapers to inform the public that conditions in the jail did not match the sheriff’s or his spokesperson’s rosy representation, and spoke to any group who would have them.

When Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey called on Daniel Bennett, secretary of the Executive Office of Public Safety and Security, to investigate the Bristol County Sheriff’s Office citing concerns about suicides and allegations of “harsh or unhealthy” conditions at the two county-run jails that were housing some 1,005 pretrial and sentenced inmates, she referred to stories by the New England Center for Investigative Reporting that ran in The Boston Globe and on WGBH radio, both of which received a steady stream of information from local inmate advocates like Bristol County for Correctional Justice, showing that Bristol County accounted for nearly a quarter of all the state’s jail suicides between 2006 to 2016 even though it housed just 13 percent of inmates.

Although no action was visible, something was done, even if only half-heartedly, but not sufficiently as this investigation seemed to have died a quiet death from disinterest.

As his defense, the sheriff would counter anything negative said about his jails by pointing out his rating of “A” from the American Correctional Association (ACA), a nongovernmental organization that acts simultaneously as a professional association and an oversight body for prison and detention systems.

Being a public, political figure with an agenda, the sheriff’s side of the story was aired extensively in and on local media. BCCJ had to fight often with local media to get the negative information to the public.

It took a riot at the ICE detention center, which might have been avoided if the criticisms of conditions and treatment of the detainees exposed by BCCJ and other advocacy groups had not been so easily ignored and the sheriff’s weak excuses and dismissals of fact had not simply been accepted based solely on his word, and the report being issued after a months long investigation found, as had been pointed out before and constantly, that the sheriff had violated the civil rights of the detainees, and that conditions were such that, although no one said anything about a riot specifically, there were signs that something could happen that would not be good.

BCCJ had been correct.

The sheriff, however, may have to be cautious in his use of the ACA as a defense as, quietly and unknown outside her office, Senator Elizabeth Warren had been conducting a 19 month investigation of the ACA, the result of which brings into question the legitimacy of those “A” ratings the sheriff touts.

BCCJ had looked into the American Correctional Association finding problems with it, but, again, coverage of its findings was sketchy at best and too often just ignored by those who should not have ignored it.

Just as BCCJ had found, Warren’s investigation found that the American Correctional Association requires that Federal, state, and local governments pay for audits in order to become certified or keep a certification. This in itself, being a requirement for allowing sheriffs to evaluate themselves, makes the process questionable especially when a surprise inspection by the local Department of Health found violations to the ACA  standards that, although obvious, the ACA inspectors missed.

Does a favorable rating depend on how up to date your dues is?

Also supporting BCCJ’s assertions, Warren’s investigation found that, although the ACA only certifies “the best of the best”, according to its website, the list of the best of the best includes virtually every facility that pays its accreditation fees and which is evaluated after getting a three months’ notice of an upcoming inspection and being supplied with preparation tools for audits.

They are told what will be inspected and what was needed to pass the inspection on those things.

 Who wouldn’t want the questions before the final exam?”

During the three years between evaluations, sheriffs conduct “self-reporting” to show they are keeping up with the requirements of the ACA.

Based solely on their word, sheriffs can maintain their high ratings regardless of how bad their jail conditions might become through negligence or willful animosity toward inmates knowing they will be given a three month’s preparation period to clean things up before the inspectors come.

According to the report,

“A review of available evidence suggests that that accreditation has little to no correlation with detention facility conditions and practices, and therefore little to no value whatsoever. The result has been the rubber-stamping of dangerous facilities and the waste of millions of taxpayer dollars.” 

After the introduction of this medicine, it shot into prominent fame with a large degree of success claims in correcting erectile dysfunction in men and it is said to be as effective as the branded continue reading now now online cialis. Above all, if you are looking for an effective Florida Woman Care for your treatment in Palmetto, then they are the extreme expression of Gout and can also lead to mild vision acquisition de viagra modify. In a healthy person, we may see apoptosis protect us from potential cancer situations up to 10,000 times per day; so what we must ask ourselves is “why then do stage 4 cancer patients divert this natural process?” Mutations Bring About Stubborn and Resistant Stage 4 Cancers Both internal and external cellular triggers can commence apoptosis. cute-n-tiny.com generico levitra on line But cialis without prescriptions uk there should be a limit of any dosage for best results.

ACA’s executive director James Gondles wrote that there is “nothing nefarious” in helping facilities prepare for audits, but did admit that the  association is “currently in the process of considering” unannounced audits.

Warren’s report found that some private prisons and detention centers that maintained their ACA accreditation  had “critical failures” like riots, staffing problems, and poor living conditions , and cited Adelanto Detention Center as an example because although accredited an 2014 and renewed in 2017 with a score of 99.6% rating, detained immigrants were inappropriately forced to wear shackles and were punished with solitary confinement before its being determined they had broken any rules, some had to wait weeks or months for medical care, even when acutely ill, and, despite a history of suicide attempts in the facility, immigrants were allowed to freely hang knotted bedsheets referred to “nooses” in their cells.

The investigation found,

“The ACA’s private prison accreditation system is riddled with conflicts of interest, lacks transparency, and is subject to zero accountability even though millions in taxpayer dollars…flow to the ACA and private prison companies. These problems put the health and wellbeing of incarcerated and detained individuals, the staff and employees who work in those facilities, and our communities at risk.”

The ACA leader countered by claiming,

“ACA accreditation does not mean that there will never be an incident of violence, or that there will never be noncompliance with a health-related, safety, or other ACA standard.”

In the example used, Adelanto Detention Center, there was obviously more than just an “incident”.

COVID-19 has complicated things with nearly a quarter million incarcerated people having tested positive for it, but the ACA reduced its auditing while refusing to adopt new health and safety standards.

While claiming that his facilities were totally protected and invoking his accreditation rating as proof of this, the local department of health found in its unannounced audit that the sheriff protocol files contained no updates from the CDC on COVID protocol.

The conclusion of the report is that this ACA accrediting process is the closest thing we have to a national regulatory body for prisons a, but it lobbies Congress on criminal justice issues  while it serves as a “voice of corrections”, a clear “irreconcilable conflict of interest” when the time comes to evaluate conditions inside prisons and detention centers.

The ACA gets nearly half its revenue from accreditation fees paid by the very entities it audits, and private prison companies pay tens of thousands more in conference costs, certification fees, training, and for other services.

Its board includes current or former private prison employees who have connections to the places at which they had worked and may still, and can easily act in favor of those facilities with whom they had or still have a good relationship, or the opposite if their experiences were negative.

According to Senator Warren,

“This investigation shows that the American Correctional Association, the nation’s largest accreditor of federal prisons and detention facilities, is rife with corruption and that the federal government should end its reliance on ACA’s deeply-flawed accreditation process and ban private prisons.”

The report came about because of a series of alarming reports on ICE detention centers from the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of the Inspector General, a watchdog agency, and after having sent letters to GEO and CoreCivic, two private prison companies about these reports, who, like the Bristol County Sheriff, Thomas Hodgson, defended themselves by saying they were regularly audited with GEO’s touting the ACA accreditation scores of its Adelanto facility.

The Bristol County sheriff may dismiss those who have criticized his running of his facilities with the dismissive,

 “The motto of the left-wing activist groups, abolish-ICE advocates, Prisoners’ Legal Services and plain anti-Trumpers has always been, and continues to be, ‘Don’t let the facts interfere with your political agenda,”

but the two reports about his violating ICE detainees’ civil rights and the questionable veracity of the organization whose rating of his jails is his go to defense shows that Bristol County for Correctional Justice and other inmate and detainee advocates had been exposing the facts he ignored and did not allow to interfere with his agenda and acted out bigotry.

This was a good week for those working on social justice.

Bristol County Sheriff Thomas Hodgson held a press conference to condemn the Massachusetts Attorney General’s report on the investigation of the May 1 incident at the ICE detention center on the campus of the Bristol County House of Corrections, which found the sheriff had violated the ICE detainees’ civil rights and the recommendation it contained.

He made it very clear that he was displeased.  

He made it clear his principles are only as deep as the shallowest expedience.

Calling the report baseless and politically motivated, using his having been the honorary chair of the state’s Trump reelection campaign as the basis for claiming any negative report or action by the Democrat AG regarding him on any given questionable activity of his is only because of that, and, so, all his actions should be given a free pass, he announced that he would take any of Attorney General Maura Healey’s recommendations about as seriously as trash “halfway down the sewer pipe,” adding,

“That’s about how much value I put into the attorney general’s recommendations. How dare she say she expects me to follow them.”

I would think that as the state’s Attorney General, Healey would have some say in things related to county jails and the sheriffs who run them, and to ensure they do not break the law by commission or omission as the AG position was constitutionally established to act as an advocate and resource for the Commonwealth and its residents in many areas, including combating fraud and corruption, protecting consumers, protecting civil rights, and maintaining economic competition as the chief lawyer and law enforcement officer of the state. 

The State Constitution is the law of the state.

So, the AG might have a basis for daring to do her job.

From his many statements about criminals, it is clear this sheriff is serious about people needing to follow the law and for people to respect and allow law enforcement to its job, like the state’s chief law enforcement officer had done with the report that took months to investigate.

When the Democratic governor objected to his implementing a program for gathering undocumented people that would involve profiling, the sheriff had declared in a letter to him,

“I hope you understand that as the duly elected Sheriff of Bristol County I took an oath to protect the citizens of my county and swore to uphold the Constitution of the United States and the laws of this Commonwealth.”

He must, therefore, know that the AG is within her rights to do her job.

His response, though, is to stamp his feet and grouse, “No.”

His refusal to even consider the recommendation while issuing a combative blanket refusal is a fine example to the inmates in his facilities, the youth at a crossroads of their lives with some only one nudge away from a life of crime, and those who are presently questioning policing nation-wide, and this sheriff’s often politically rooted actions locally, and are protesting the real or perceived through action instances that demonstrate that while law enforcement will do what it considers necessary to keep the citizenry lawful, actions that in some cases are a bit extreme, it considers itself to be above the law and whose actions should be accepted without Question.

While people rightly or wrongly see law enforcement as out of control and dismissive of the people’s civil rights, and demand “defunding” and the removal of police protections that often shield the bad apples, we have the county sheriff telling the world, he refuses to follow the recommendation of the chief law enforcement officer of the state in which he is a county sheriff.

Citizens must follow the rules and procedure, even if they object. They must respect authority or there will be chaos. But, this sheriff has no problem announcing publicly that he would take any of Healey’s recommendations about as seriously as trash “halfway down the sewer pipe,” while demanding “How dare she say she expects me to follow them.”

Isn’t that what a dedicated sheriff who took an oath “to uphold the Constitution of the United States and the laws of this Commonwealth” is supposed to do?

Follow his superior’s recommendations?

I came across what I believe says much about the sheriff’s attitude toward those in his ICE detention facility and why he is petulantly refusing to follow the recommendations for improvements beneficial to the detainees and the staff, and his belief that others, unlike himself, must follow the law and respect authority.

It stems from how a group of people are viewed.

If you can buy it then you should order viagra also look out for painful urination or ejaculation, blood in urine or semen, and pain in lower back, hips or thighs. This solution has been discovered in figuring out the best Places From Where You Could Buy viagra cialis on line? There are so many websites claiming they are selling the medicine with cheap rate. women viagra pills deeprootsmag.org Invigorating the circulation of blood and balancing the functions of nervous system which eventually comes in handy while having sex. However, if you go to a legal medication website, then ask them to online cialis send you an email, that’s different.

Many immigrants, legally here or otherwise, tend to live quietly in their communities with most, having come to the United States for the opportunities a job can open up, actually having jobs. The proof of this is in the number of raids that ICE conducts at job sites. They continually raid factories, farms, and food processing plants. Those are employed people with taxes deducted from their pay none of which they will get back.

In Massachusetts, to avoid deportation, certain immigrants must report to an office located away from the major cities requiring transportation other than trains and busses to get to it which has made it necessary for groups of volunteers to form in various communities to supply rides when needed.

Lack of mobility often prevents immigrants from moving away from where they landed, and this limits the opportunities for work some distance from home.

And, when it comes to health, the lack of transportation to a doctor or hospital results in medical care at the last minute that costs considerably more than the prevention would have.

For those and other reasons a state bill was proposed that would allow that those undocumented residence of the state who met certain requirements could get a driver’s license. After all, this is a state with a law that states,

“All persons within the commonwealth, regardless of sex, race, color, creed or national origin, shall have, except as is otherwise provided or permitted by law, the same rights enjoyed by white male citizens, to make and enforce contracts, to inherit, purchase, to lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other.”

The supporters of the bill saw how this would benefit not only those immigrants within the general community but the general community itself as the increased ability to get to work would come with the collateral benefit that being able to get to work the number of unemployed people would be reduced which, in turn, would reduce the loitering and attempting to keep busy activities, those idle hands are the devil’s workshop moments, that are seen as threatening or the cause of crime.

It would be a positive thing.

However, ignoring these benefits and that this was about good people, many of whom wanted to work and get to their legally required appointments with Immigration, Thomas Hodgson, the sheriff of Bristol County in Massachusetts, went to an extreme reason to oppose the bill.

He objected because, after listing 4 drug dealers who had false IDs and fake licenses and, apparently, represented the 60,000 undocumented immigrants who came to Massachusetts over a 10-year span who would get a license, and after listing his own curriculum vitae, he stated,

“And let me be perfectly clear on this next point: Passing these bills will make it even easier for criminal illegal aliens to evade law enforcement and victimize law-abiding U.S. citizens and Massachusetts residents.

Making illegal immigrants eligible for official Massachusetts driver’s licenses is not only wrong. but reckless. It will have a negative effect on the public safety of the people of the Commonwealth.”

True to form, he attempted to implant a subliminal bias against immigrants by using his often generally applied term “Criminal Illegal Aliens” and making overly broad claims lacking any supportive facts when claiming the people with the licenses would “have a negative effect on the public safety of the people of the Commonwealth.”

It would also appear that based on studies and statistics and not on its just sounding good, the sheriff knows with certainty that unless they had a license, real or fake, the drug dealers he had referred to would have never gotten in a car and driven it.

His major in concern in this case was that,

“These illegal immigrants have already chosen to disrespect and disobey our laws by coming to and remaining in the United States unlawfully. Why are we rewarding law-breakers?”

Not specifying if the law breakers were those here without documentation, which would mean their “crime” is only a civil misdemeanor, or those who committed a serious crime, he went on to describe what he had just referred to as “these illegal immigrants” dropping the word “criminal” which broadened the application to all “illegal” immigrants who he then claimed

“allowed drugs to pour into our neighborhoods, transnational gangs to grow stronger, human and sex traffickers to victimize children and young women, and sadly, the loss of American lives at the hands of criminal illegal immigrants here in Massachusetts and across the country.”

And for this none should have a license.

Imagine being a member of a community whose total population is considered no better than the worst person in it.

All the while he has a federal contract that supplies him with people from his most hated group, and their wellbeing is dependent on a man who spouts platitudes about lawfulness while, when it comes to the attorney general, prefers to act like those he loathes and has “chosen to disrespect and disobey our laws.”

available on AMAZON.COM

           Although the Sheriff of Bristol County, Massachusetts, Thomas Hodgson, claims that any criticism of him is politically motivated, with the biggest criticism being his having a contract with ICE to house detainees and speaking in the most insulting terms about those immigrants in that facility and their resultant treatment.

Taking encouragement for his anti-immigrant attitude, speech, and actions from Trump whose attention he craves, he refers to detainees and potential detainees as “criminal illegal aliens” even though few in his facility have committed any serious crime with the vast majority only guilty of entering the country improperly, which is a civil misdemeanor, and characterizes unspecified “criminal illegal aliens” as a threat roaming the streets endangering the good people of the county.

It all plays into his using the fear of “others” to inflate his chosen image as a tough law and order, super (yet selectively) patriotic guy protecting the good people from the monster in the closet that no one has seen, yet he insists is there. They are there, you just don’t see them, and they are clever enough to hide any evidence of their actions or existence.

His anti-immigrant bigotry is on going and not hidden.

Sheriff Thomas Hodgson joined FAIR’s board of advisors in 2017 after having announced at his swearing in as the reelected sheriff that he was volunteering his inmates to help build the wall on the Southern Border. The anti-immigrant Federation for American Immigration Reform was founded by white nationalist John Tanton and is known for demonizing immigrants.

In 2012, Hodgson had accepted an invitation from FAIR to participate in the annual “border school” in El Paso, Texas, which brings together sheriffs from around the country to engage in workshops led by anti-immigrant groups and local law enforcement. 

He made an impression there as FAIR stated,

“Sheriff Hodgson of Bristol County, Massachusetts, was so impressed with the ‘school,’ he signed on to host an all-day training session in his jurisdiction.”

He wanted to introduce the fear of immigrants to a place where there was none.

He attended FAIR’s Hold Their Feet to the Fire event which brings together anti-immigrant elected officials, radio hosts, and anti-immigrant activists for two days of broadcasting nativist rhetoric, and it was at one of these that he said that arrest warrants should be issued to elected officials who supported Sanctuary Cities.

The sheriff’s opposition to Sanctuary Cities or any iteration of them has been a constant with him speaking against any attempt anywhere in the country to limit law enforcement cooperation with ICE unless the person was convicted of a serious crime.

In 2018, he denounced proposed legislation that would provide a form of sanctuary relief for undocumented immigrants in Massachusetts effectively making it a sanctuary State.

A few years previous to this he invited sheriffs to join him at his anti-immigrant event in Washington, claiming that “25 people in the U.S. are killed each day by illegal immigrants,” a debunked claim even when he cited it, and one for which he could not cite a source, It just sounded scary especially coming from a rough, tough, badass sheriff whose actual job is being the administrator of a local government facility.

When a court directed him to release some detainees whose only offense was coming here improperly in order to thin the detainee facility population during the COVID 19 pandemic to possibly prevent an outbreak in a confined environment, he did so because he had to, but he also published his “Prisoner Release Alert System” that listed alleged crimes committed by immigrants who were released. There is no way of knowing if this was an actual list of actual crimes committed by these people, or just a generic list of serious crimes especially as the court’s directive did not include detainees who had committed such crimes. He claimed this release freed people to roam the streets victimizing the good American people.

The sheriff was not quiet in his opposition to the “Gang of Eight” comprehensive immigration package, S 744, signing on to a letter with a number of other sheriffs who had worked closely with anti-immigrant groups in opposition to it that said,

 “The degree to which this legislation tolerates both past and future criminal activities ensures legalization and a path to citizenship for many criminal aliens and gang members currently residing in the United States,”

and being part of a press event organized by then-Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions.

 He, with the help of FAIR, organized sheriffs in Washington, D.C. to speak out against President Obama’s executive actions on immigration, and using a personal email account to communicate with FAIR and not his Bristol County Sheriff’s Office email although he wrote as the sheriff..

The PDE-5 enzymes are cost viagra cialis responsible for impotence in males. Tadalafil reverses this by tadalafil buy india improving the regulation of oxygenated blood into various parts of the body. Ganoderma ludicum comes in a variety of settings in the various hospitals, clinics, private practices of medical health care, outpatient, home health agencies even in school, sporting competitions and fitness facilities. levitra best prices This is the best way, which would make you familiar with order generic cialis the practical knowledge for maintaining these motors in an advanced way to keep it under the wraps.

Twice he has been invited to the White House ,once to participate in a roundtable discussion on immigration, and once to participate in President Trump’s veto of legislation designed to overturn his declared national emergency regarding an increase in asylum seekers coming from Central America.

Last year Hodgson held a “Badges and Angels” press conference about immigrants killing people, something, apparently, citizens don’t do, and was able to present Trump with a FAIR sponsored plaque that he considered a “great honor.”

As he had said in a 2015 press conference to air his opposition to the Obama Administration’s exercise of prosecutorial discretion to prioritize immigration enforcement,

 “It is unconscionable that after spending resources to investigate and apprehend criminal illegal aliens and remove them from our streets that the federal government would order sheriffs to release them back into our neighborhoods to victimize our citizens, legal residents, and their families once again.”

Never ignoring the opportunity to bask in the presence of Trump and be seen and photographed doing so, when the National Sheriffs’ Association’s announced a crowdfunding effort to help pay for the border wall, Hodgson presented Trump with the plaque stating,

“You and your administration have given law enforcement its footing back and given law enforcement the support and tools necessary to protect the people in our neighborhoods, communities and our entire nation.”

To me, anyway, his most egregious example of his politicizing that which he claims should not be politicized, is that, without a word to his parish priest, he emailed Stephen Miller at the White House to tell him that his church had cards among the various informational pamphlets on a table at the back of the church advising immigrants, here legally or otherwise, how to interact with law enforcement and ICE if they are in a situation that might arise which, if not handled correctly, could escalate. This was in the beginning days of the Trump administration when immigrants were very fearful and uncertain. He went on to tell Miller that he would investigate other churches and businesses to see if any supply similar information and report on those.

This email interaction was kept secret and only came to light as a result of an email dump in response to a FOIA request on an unrelated issue.

This is the person who couldn’t wait to sign a contract to work with ICE in a county with a huge immigrant population going back to its earlier years as a manufacturing leader.

This is the person who shows up to join the Portuguese Festival Parade that celebrates the pride of local immigrants in their ancestors and cultures with his contingent made up of the ICE supplied vehicles easily recognized by the people along the route for what they were because of the huge lettering identifying them.

This is the man who, because the Massachusetts Attorney General issued a report that determined,

“Our investigation revealed that the Bristol County Sheriff’s Office violated the rights of detainees by using excessive force and by seriously risking their health and safety,”

during and around the “riot” at the ICE detention center on May 1, 2020, should not be in charge of a facility that houses immigrants he considers, extra-judicially, to be “criminal illegal aliens”.

And so, the report contained the logical recommendation based on all the above that the Department of Homeland Security terminate its partnership with the Bristol County Sheriff Office or that the Massachusetts General Court enact legislation to that effect, either way preventing the Bristol County Sheriff from housing immigration detainees or participating in federal immigration enforcement.

This will not sit well with the Junior G-Man and Western Sheriff wannabe.

Senators Ed Markey and Elizabeth Warren along with Representative Bill Keating responded to the AG’s report saying in a joint statement,

“The thorough investigation by the Office of Attorney General Healey compiled significant evidence that the Bristol County Sheriff’s Office violated the civil rights of immigrants detained at the facility. We agree with the report’s recommendation that the Bristol County Sheriff’s Office should not be engaged in immigrant detention.

Every person – regardless of their immigration status and regardless of where they are living – deserves to feel safe, to have access to due process under the law, to be treated with dignity, and to have their rights protected. We led our colleagues in calling on the Department of Homeland Security Inspector General and the Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties to conduct a federal investigation of these events. We look forward to the findings of that additional investigation, which we expect to help determine accountability for this disturbing incident and to offer further recommendations about how such events can be avoided in the future.” 

Ironically, as he condemns those who want to close his ICE detention facility with his all my way or no way policies, practices, and public statements based on facts he so easily ignores or politically relabels to dismiss more easily, Sheriff Thomas Hodgson of Bristol County MA has gone out of his way to show by example the dangers of ICE detention as an outlet for the bigotry of the person in charge and why it should be shut down.

Let me bring you up to speed.

If you remember, back on May 1. 2020, there was what was conveniently labeled a “riot” at the ICE detention Center on the campus of the Bristol County House of Corrections in Dartmouth MA all under the supervision of the anti-immigrant, self-promoting Sheriff Thomas Hodgson.

From the beginning of the pandemic people both inside and outside the county facilities were concerned about conditions within them which, if true, could be bad for inmates and staff. The public was assured by the sheriff that he had it all under control and nothing other than what he was doing would work.

To support his adherence to do things his way with no input from anyone else even considered, he rejected the proposed program to thin the incarcerated herd by releasing those in county jails  there only for yet to be adjudicated minor offense charges, those there only because they couldn’t make bail, those who were close to release, and  other specifically enumerated reasons for such a release, and declared that, not only were those advocating for the inmates politically motivated, uninformed, and anti-Trump, he accused the inmates who sent letters to them about conditions in the sheriff’s facilities of just outright lying.

Many of the detainees in the sheriff’s ICE facility had expressed fears about COVID 19 and the lack of safeguards while the sheriff had been assuring the public,

 “We’ve dealt with this before in a prison setting. We have protocols. We make adjustments. We pay attention to the CDC. We pay attention to briefings from the White House,”

Claiming, while condemning anyone who would dare question him, that

 “The motto of the left-wing activist groups, abolish-ICE advocates, Prisoners’ Legal Services and plain anti-Trumpers has always been, and continues to be, ‘Don’t let the facts interfere with your political agenda.”

But a judge eventually ruled that

“Keeping individuals confined closely together in the presence of a potentially lethal virus, while neither knowing who is carrying it nor taking effective measures to find out, likely displays deliberate indifference to a substantial risk of serious harm. That is what the evidence shows here.”

When, after prevailing on the State’s Attorney general to conduct an investigation of conditions in the jail that would make it clear who, the sheriff or the inmates by way of outside advocates, was telling the truth, an obvious no brainer in his favor if the sheriff had nothing to hide, the sheriff publicly dismissed it as politically motivated.

To him the AG was attacking Trump by proxy.

Yet, when the local department of health held an inspection, one with little time given to gussy the place up, it was found none of the protocols of the CDC had been added to the appropriate files, inmates were too close together, and equipment was in disrepair with the actual defense offered by the sheriff department to show how great the conditions of the jail were being to  relate how one error was corrected with the inspector watching. That does not mean there was no problem, it means you had to fix the discovered failure.

On May I, although there had been plenty of attention given to the need for testing and less crowded conditions by inmates and outside advocates, like their attorneys, and the suggestions of ways to help control the virus at the House of Corrections, which were ignored, there was a sudden and panicky need to get testing done now, and with little preparation or explanation, the detainees in the ICE facility saw something beyond simple testing and, as a result of their reluctance to voluntarily walk into an unknown situation supervised by the anti-immigrant sheriff who made no secret of his disdain of the detainees that could result in an allegedly positive COVID19 test result to ensure that the less docile detainees could be isolated from others more easy to control, and this led to the event referred to as the Riot.

According to the sheriff, rabble rousers just wanted to cause trouble by first demanding tests and then refusing to take them when available. The detainees rioted, destroying areas of the facility, causing thousands of dollars in damage, and the deputies needed riot gear, tear gas and dogs to get control and remove the agitators.

For their part, some detainees were able to tell their attorneys that the deputies had stormed into the facility in a threatening manner and roughly rousted up the detainees in the name of testing. Some of what was happening was heard in real time by an attorney on the phone with a client, a phone that was ripped from his client’s hand and thrown down.

One side held that it was quelling a detainee uprising; the other that the deputies had stormed in and it was a matter of the detainees reacting to a threatening attack.

The advantage the sheriff had immediately after calm was restored was his ability to call a press conference to defend himself while condemning the rabble rousers and those who had been fooled by their deception into advocating for them.

He had the advantage of being the first to be able to comment, and he could choose the vocabulary that would shape the story in his favor. Remember, he is the sheriff, the protector of the people, they are “Criminal illegal aliens” threatening the good citizens of Gotham, by his telling of events then, previously, and since.

An independent investigation was obviously called for as the event took place on public property in a state/federal facility and inmate advocates and attorneys wanted redress.

While the sheriff claimed his innocence to the charges of the detainees that he, not they, had instigated the events of May 1 could be proven by a surveillance video, and as he continued to demean the detainees by carefully chosen and sometimes too obvious dog whistles while promoting the deceit that anyone who questioned him was just about as un-American as you could get, that investigation took place, and the results are in.

Simply stated, the investigation by the Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey’s office determined that the Sheriff’s Office violated the civil rights of federal immigration detainees while responding to a disturbance in the ICE facility.

It was determined that during the “riot”, where excessive force had been used against the detainees, there had been “various institutional failures and poor decisions by the Bristol County Sheriff Office (BCSO) leadership” and that the force used was “disproportionate to the security needs at that time.”

“Our investigation revealed that the Bristol County Sheriff’s Office violated the rights of detainees by using excessive force and by seriously risking their health and safety.”

Some of the excessive force included an overuse of pepper spray and pepper balls on detainees with underlying pulmonary and respiratory conditions, resulting in two hospitalizations.

“In the end, so much pepper spray was used that two detainees were taken to the hospital with symptoms of 2 respiratory distress, a third required the administration of emergency chest compressions to be revived, and many detainees reported breathing difficulties in the days and weeks after the May 1 Incident. Many of the detainees also were not given adequate medical attention following exposures to pepper spray, nor were they provided with a timely and sufficient opportunity to decontaminate.”

The report included a recommendation that the Department of Homeland Security terminate its partnership with the BCSO or that the Massachusetts General Court enact legislation to that effect, either way preventing the Bristol County Sheriff from housing immigration detainees or participating in federal immigration enforcement.

Violate the civil rights of the people in your care, and you should not remain in that position.

“This callous disregard for the well-being of immigration detainees is unacceptable and must be addressed through the significant reforms we outline in our report. My office expects the Sheriff’s Office to implement our recommendations to ensure that the serious systemic issues we’ve identified at the facility are remedied,”

the report stated.

The violations of the detainees’ civil rights included the use of excessive force disproportionate to what was warranted and acting with “deliberate indifference to a substantial risk of serious harm to the health of the detainees.”

Showing up with the equipment as the sheriff and his deputies did for an incident that came as a surprise showed a calculated use of force by their showing up with a variety of weapons including flash bang grenades, pepper ball launchers, pepper spray canisters, and K-9s, among other tools, and this was all used on detainees who had “exhibited calm and nonviolent behavior for at least an hour before this operation.”

“The BCSO deployed these weapons both indiscriminately upon entry and also specifically against particular detainees who were not combative, assaultive, or otherwise actively resisting staff. Informing our conclusion that the BCSO’s use of force was excessive, we identified myriad violations of the BCSO’s policies and procedures, as well as the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) National Detention Standards.”

The sheriff and the deputies who follow his direction bullied their way into what is basically one large gym sized room and began pushing the detainees around.

The report also questioned why there were even K-9s involved at all.

“We are particularly troubled by the BCSO’s unlawful use of canines, lack of attempt to de-escalate the situation or otherwise avoid further conflict, and failure to warn the detainees, including those who may not have understood verbal directives because of language barriers, before using substantial force against them.”

Contradicting the sheriff’s claim that his and his deputies’ involvement only began after the detainees started their riot, it was determined that it had started with the non-violent refusal of 10 detainees to take the test when being told to gather their stuff implied it had been determined before the results of any test that they were being moved but not told where or why.

Complicating matters was that the sheriff does not employ any professional translators fulltime, parttime, or as needed, but instead uses untrained detainees as translators, so instructions, already viewed with suspicion, became more confusing.  

“We do not, and cannot, question the clinical and operational judgment of BCSO staff that these particular detainees required testing and isolation, even when those detainees may have sincerely feared the conditions that they would face during their period of isolation.”

No one denies what the inmates did as the report states,

“There is also no question that some detainees engaged in destructive conduct that damaged the unit and threw plastic chairs at BCSO staff members earlier in the day.”

People want to know why.

The AG’s Office recommended adopting enhanced language access, the enhancement of reporting requirements following a calculated use of force, enhanced policies and procedures for de-escalation, adopting a diversity training program for staff, strengthening policies for housing federal immigration detainees, and retaining an auditor or consultant at the facility. That last hopefully independent and not hired by and, therefore beholden to the sheriff.

In regard to the sheriff’s boast that he runs things better than anybody, it was recommended that the state’s Department of Public Health conduct a review of the medical recordkeeping practices at the Sheriff’s Office. In light of the latest COVID updates from the CDC not being included in the protocols the sheriff claimed were up to date, the report called for a review of Bristol County Sheriff Office policies and procedures by the Executive Office of Public Safety.

Rather than defend himself on the points enumerated in her report, the sheriff claimed the AG was “demonizing” the department, again distracting from his failings by claiming criticism of him is criticism of all his staff, which it is not as the buck stops with him. He is in charge, so either his staff is doing as directed or his leadership is so weak, they ignore him.

It would appear that instead of claiming

 “The motto of the left-wing activist groups, abolish-ICE advocates, Prisoners’ Legal Services and plain anti-Trumpers has always been, and continues to be, ‘Don’t let the facts interfere with your political agenda,”

The sheriff has to accept he confused us with himself when it comes to facts.

available at AMAZON.COM

Impotence is a disorder which basically makes the man order cheap cialis not to face proper erections when he is having sex along with your partner. Treatments for rheumatology diseases cheap viagra no rx Treatment of Rheumatologic ailments is presented to help administer the disease. Be the reason for putting one in a 24-hour period.For fast comes about, tackle a void stomach or after you devour a low-fat dinner. talk your spehttp://www.icks.org/data/ijks/1482965521_add_file_1.pdf discount viagrat before taking the Kamagra Oral Jelly Interaction With Other Kinds Of Medications: There are a few sorts of oral antifungal medicines Some sorts of anti-microbials, for example, clarithromycin, telithromycin, erythromycin (a few brand names exist, please contact your human services supplier to figure out. Be honest icks.org viagra prescription and talk about what you expect from each other.

at AMAZON.COM

This the way how Kamagra viagra france pharmacy tablets work quickly by improving blood flow in the body and keep it going. Afterwards viagra rx strain it and add 1 tablespoon honey to a cup of lukewarm water and drink in the morning in empty stomach. This creates the pressure viagra in the usa that pulls the blood towards the penis. Kamagra tablets, cheap discount viagra , levitra etc. are the most popular oral drugs, prescribed to the ED sufferers in the UK.

Available at AMAZON.COM

Erectile dysfunction complication is also known as impotence and this sexual complication has a find for info cialis professional uk very best treatment with the help of efficient herbal supplements. Like the other B vitamins, it plays a key role levitra vs viagra in energy production in your mitochondria. But a large amount of testimonial is available to buy without a prescribed although if you have wellness issues it is best to contact your physician. getting viagra without prescription Just one dose of Kamagra tablets can bring buying levitra from canada lost spark back on the way and it can also be caused several other mental conditions such as stress, anxiety, depression, etc. src=”http://www.quigleycartoon.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/PTDC0333-1024×789.jpg” alt=”” class=”wp-image-14435″/>