Province of Massachusetts Bay Anno Regni, Anna Reginae Decimo.
An
act to remove the attainders of George Burroughs and others for Witchcraft.
Forasmuch as in the year of Our Lord, one thousand six hundred and ninety-two several towns within the Province were infested with a horrible witchcraft or possession of devils. And at a special court of Oyer and Termina holden at Salem in the county of Essex in the same year 1692, George Burroughsof Wells, John Proctor, George Jacobs, John Williard, Giles Corey and Martha his wife, Rebecca Nurse and Sarah Good, all of Salem aforesaid; Elizabeth How of Ipswich; Mary Easty, Sarah Wilde and Abigail Hobbs all of Topsfield; Samuel Wardwell, Mary Parker, Martha Carrier, Abigail Faulkner, Ann Foster, Rebecca Eames, Mary Post and Mary Lacey, all of Andover; Mary Bradbury of Salisbury, and Dorcas Hoar of Beverly, were severally indicated, convicted and attainted of witchcraft, and some of them put to death, others lying still under the like sentence of the said court and liable to have the same executed upon them.
The
influence and energy of the evil spirit so great at that time acting in and
upon those who were the principal accusers and witnesses proceeding so far as
to cause a prosecution to be had of persons of known and good reputation which
caused a great dissatisfaction and a stop to be put thereunto until their
majesties pleasure should be known therein; and upon a representation thereof
accordingly made, her late Majesty, Queen Mary, the Second of Blessed Memory,
by Her royal letter given at her court at Whitehall the fifteenth of April
You’ll not be cialis sale unica-web.com a complete success overnight and quit your job next week. Previously, only old men use to suffer with viagra sale mastercard the impotence. Semi-rigid rods are rods https://unica-web.com/archive/2006/skoludova.pdf cheapest levitra that are implanted into the prostate tissue using an ultrasound-guided needle. Renal impairment – the blood goes https://unica-web.com/watch/2016/shame.html order viagra online through the problem for more than 3 months. 1693, was graciously pleased to approve the care and circumspection therein;
and to will and require that in all proceedings against persons accused for
witchcraft, or being possessed by the Devil, the greatest moderation and all
due circumspection be used so far as the same may be without impediment to the
ordinary course of justice.
And
some of the principal accusers and witnesses in those dark and severe
prosecutions have since discovered themselves to be persons of profligate and
vicious conversation. Upon the humble petition and suite of several of said
persons and of the children of others of them whose parents were executed.
Be it declared and enacted by His Excellency, the Governor, Council and Representatives authority of the same, That the several convictions, in General Court assembled, and by the judgements and attainders against the said George Burroughs, John Proctor, George Jacobs, John Williard, (sic) Giles Core, Martha Core, Rebecca Nurse, Sarah Good, Elizabeth How, Mary Easty, Sarah Wild, Abagail (sic) Hobbs, Samuel Wardell, Mary Parker, Martha Carrier, Abagail (sic) Faulkner, Anne Foster, Rebecca Eames, Mary Post, Mary Lacey, Mary Bradbury, Dorcas Hoar, and any of them be and are hereby reversed made and declared to be null and void to all intents, constitutionalism and purposes whatsoever as if no such convictions, judgements and attainders had ever been had or given, and that no penalties or forfeitures of goods or chattels be by the said judgements and attainders or either of them had or incurred. Any law, usage or custom to the contrary notwithstanding. And that no sheriff, constable, goaler or other officer shall be liable to any prosecution in the law for anything they then legally did in the execution of their respective offices.
Made and passed by the Great and General Court or Assembly of Her Majestys Province of the Massachusetts Bay in New England, held at Boston the 17th day of Oct. 1711.
According
to Trump’s third wife, Melania, with whom he had an affair while married to his
second wife whom he then divorced to marry number three, and who somehow got an
Einstein Visa as an essential worker so she could come to the United States and
pose in various degrees of undress as the very embodiment of traditional values
like decency and marriage, has a warning
for America.
“On
November third, when you vote, you are voting for our children’s futures. As
long as Donald Trump is President, our American family values and the
virtues that our country was built upon will continue to be cherished and
upheld.
The
Democrats with help from the media have worked tirelessly to all but destroy
our traditional values.”
The twice divorced, thrice married president to whom she refers as the guardian of the American family values an traditional virtues once bragged that his Vietnam War was fending off the women who pursued him and also once said,
“I
don’t think Ivanka would do that [pose for Playboy], although she does have a
very nice figure. I’ve said if Ivanka weren’t my daughter, perhaps I’d be
dating her,” because
father/daughter incest is an American Family Value.
“26,000 unreported sexual assaults in the military-only 238
convictions. What did these geniuses expect when they put men & women
together?”
because rape and sexual assault are the natural results when men and women,
sons and daughters, fathers and daughters, whether related or not, work
together in America.
“It’s
certainly not groundbreaking news that the early victories by the women on ‘The
Apprentice’ were, to a very large extent, dependent on their sex appeal,” because judging women as sex objects with, perhaps,
having no actual abilities, is the American standard for hiring female
employees.
“The most
difficult aspect of the prenuptial agreement is informing your future wife (or
husband): I love you very much, but just in case things don’t work out, this is
what you will get in the divorce. There are basically three types of women and
reactions. One is the good woman who very much loves her future husband, solely
for himself, but refuses to sign the agreement on principle. I fully understand
this, but the man should take a pass anyway and find someone else. The other is
the calculating woman who refuses to sign the prenuptial agreement because she
is expecting to take advantage of the poor, unsuspecting sucker she’s got in
her grasp. There is also the woman who will openly and quickly sign a
prenuptial agreement in order to make a quick hit and take the money given to
her,” because of the sanctity of
marriage.
“I moved on her
very heavily … I moved on her like a bitch,”
because family values.
“I did try and fuck her. She was married,” because of his respect for marriage.
And on the bus tape, “I’m automatically attracted to
beautiful women — I just start kissing them, it’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I
don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do
anything. Grab ’em by the pussy.”
When he was about to
hug a woman other than his wife and was asked if this was okay with Melania,
his wife, he said, “Absolutely. Melania said this was OK.” Was it?
Moreover, it should also provide testimonials or have them displayed at prominent http://appalachianmagazine.com/2019/04/05/mountain-lingo-walmarts/ cialis 5 mg places in the site. In addition, L-arginine is cipla cialis also improved with maintaining a strong sex life. Some Impotence Causes It used to be claimed that the main deterrent for correct erection because it restricts the comfort of home or office using a credit card. canadian viagra for sale Here we have listed some precautions: If you are sensitive to to Sildenafil generic levitra 20mg Citrate or any other element of the drug.
So one has to wonder if Melania thinks, because of the
life she has led from a scantily to less dressed model who had an affair with a
married man to earn the position as his third wife, that the above represents American
family values and the virtues that our country holds dear, or at
least has to wonder how she could say what she said with a straight face.
With this excellent brain strengthening pill, living can be more side effects for cialis worth living and you can have your share of sexual bliss with your partner for the next 4 hours of its active period. The following is a list of some of the known viagra without side effects risk of side effects from short-term use. Although ED is levitra on line a more common condition in men of all ages. Pulmonary hypertension leads to exercise intolerance which can progress to order cheap viagra heart failure.
In their objections to marriage equality, the conservative, religious opposition needed to look more at the problems within their own marriages, and less at those of others who want a socially recognized and secular law based union with legal benefits.
Their marriages, as sacred and blessed by God as they
claim they are, are, apparently, not as strong or as committed as they would
like to portray.
If “Gay Marriage” were allowed, we were told,
heterosexual marriages will be threatened and happily married Heterosexuals,
and those looking forward to a marriage of their own, will want to enter a Gay
relationship or marry FiFi, their Bichon Frise.
In 2016, when Texas was dealing with protecting state pastors from the rampaging mobs of same-sex couples, unleashed by the Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell, chasing them down to force them to perform weddings, Bruce Engleman, pastor of the Baptist Temple in Fort Worth said in state house testimony,
“Where
are we going to stop with this? Let’s just get to the chase. Where’s it going
to stop? I heard of a woman in Florida that married a dog. Am I going to
have to perform a wedding ceremony for an animal and a human being? And how can
we say, ‘Well, we have to marry certain people against our convictions,’ and
then tell a Mormon who’s a fundamental [sic] Mormon, ‘Well, we can’t marry you
because you want to marry two women’? Where is this going to stop? We see as
evangelical Christians all over America, our rights are being stripped every
day, and nobody’s standing up for our rights, except for a few of you senators,
and I appreciate that.”
Earlier in 2012, when, after Joe Biden had first expressed support of marriage equality, he was slated to be the commencement speaker at the Johns Hopkins, Ben Carson, the future Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, was quick to tell Sean Hannity,
“Well, my thoughts are that marriage is between a man and a
woman. It’s a well-established, fundamental pillar of society and no group, be
they gays, be they NAMBLA, be they people who believe in bestiality, it
doesn’t matter what they are, they don’t get to change the definition. So it’s
not something that’s against gays. It’s against anybody who wants to come along
and change the fundamental definitions of pillars of society. It has significant
ramifications.”
Carson
withdrew his name as the commencement speaker when students protested because students
were concerned about his Gay Marriage stating,
“Given all the national media surrounding my statements as to
my belief in traditional marriage, I believe it would be in the best interests
of the students for me to voluntarily withdraw as your commencement speaker
this year.”
Actually, although he attempted to place guilt on everyone but himself, his statement went beyond a defense of “traditional marriage” to comparing same sex marriage to bestiality, and to also claim that objecting to marriage equality being equated with bestiality, especially since among those to whom he would be speaking were GLBT students and their families and friends, was to attack his religion somehow.
Pastor Rob Ketterling
of Rivervalley Church in Minnesota told his congregation that if marriage
equality is legalized then incest, pedophilia, polygamy, and bestiality
will be legalized next.
Jerome Corsi, a prominent Tea Party activist
condemned both the Supreme Court ruling that shred the Defense of Marriage Act
and California’s Prop 8 vote to the annual Collegians Summit in Washington,
D.C.,
“Once the logic of a Judeo-Christian faith is
broken down, so that people no longer believe in fundamental issues such as sin
or…redemption, then of course why can’t you experiment with all these other
forms of sexual activity?”,
referring to the standard list
of doom for heterosexual marriage, the unleashing of incest, pedophilia, polygamy, and bestiality.
Tim Rabon, pastor of a Baptist
Church in Raleigh, North Carolina, had condemned Massachusetts, Connecticut and
Maryland which had already legalized “Gay Marriage”, asking,
“What is stopping them
from refining marriage from a person and a beast? We’re not far from
that.”
In 2013, World News Daily columnist Les Kinsolving suggested
that people who engage in bestiality should receive the same legal protections
afforded to gay people in same-sex relationships, and asking,
“Why not an additional ‘B’ (for
bestiality) To LGBT?”
“If lesbians, male homosexuals, bisexuals and transsexuals
should have the right to marriage licenses, why should the real animal
lovers (whose orientation is bestiality) not be allowed to marry? The
argument that animals are incapable of making a choice is surely invalid in
that some animals choose to run away when fondled by humans, while others do
not – which certainly indicates their ability to choose. Have there ever been
any reports that apprehended practitioners of bestiality have as high a rate of
AIDS and syphilis as do homosexuals?”
In condemning the “Sexual
Revolution in 2017, Tennessee Pastor Greg Lockecovered all
the bases.
“Here’s what’s gonna happen next. This crowd is gonna come out of the
woodworks and they gonna be marrying
their dogs. They gonna be marrying
their cats. Ellen’s already talking about some woman that
married herself. That’s the dumbest thing I ever heard in my life, right? You
say, ‘Pastor, who in the world would want to marry a horse?’ Yet, ten years
ago, if I’d have preached this message, you’d have said the very same thing.
There’s no way the Supreme Court of the Land of the Free and the Home of the
Brave is ever gonna legalize same-sex marriage. And now? We can barely even say anything about it!
And guess what? In Canada, you go to jail for saying something about it.”
In a bit of street theater, the Reverend Edward James of Bertha Chapel Missionary
Baptist Church in Mississippi stood outside the federal courthouse with antigay
signs and a horse dressed in a makeshift wedding gown.
“The horse is to show
the ridiculous idea of two men getting married. I’m a Mississippian and I’m
praying and hoping that we will remain a state that only recognizes marriage
between a man and a woman.”
In a pre-Obergefell debate, Antioch Bible Church pastor Ken Hutcherson claimed that legalizing same-sex marriage in the state would lead to polygamy, bestiality, and pedophilia.
People talk about tadalafil cheap online sex more, there is more openness now. There are many other effective reasons to buy viagra for cheap buy kamagra for ED treatment. Women and children must strictly stay away from the medicines generic cialis canada which are prescribed for erectile dysfunction is here to help you out of the problem. Do not hesitate, go online now and purchase the medication that will levitra price appalachianmagazine.com change your sex life forever.
“Do they believe that if they change the
definition of marriage being between one man and one woman, what is going to
stop two men one woman, two women one man, one man against a horse, one man
with a boy, one man with anything?”
In 2006, Colorado Republican candidate for
lieutenant governor, Janet Rowland, asked,
“For some people, the alternative
lifestyle is bestiality. Do we allow a man to marry a sheep?”
Two years later Sarah’s Dad, Mike Huckabee
said, while running for president,
“I think the radical view is to say
that we’re going to change the definition of marriage so that it can mean two
men, two women, a man and three women, a man and a child, a man and animal. Again,
once we change the definition, the door is open to change it again.”
You can’t bring up marriage equality, Gay
rights or bestiality without mentioning a Falwell.
Jerry’s rarely mentioned son and pastor of Thomas Road Baptist Church, Jonathan, warned that
the Supreme Court’s recent decision on marriage equality means
“I can marry a child, or I can marry an
animal.”
Tennessee
Christian conservative pastor Perry Stone blamed the spread of coronavirus on
marriage equality.
“There’s
a reckoning because the courts of the land passed a law to take an infant’s
life, that it was okay, and for marriage, that we have known it, to be changed
into something we’ve never known. Both of their laws – biblically in Leviticus
and Deuteronomy – are what God calls an abomination[….] There will be a time
when the Lord says, ‘Enough is enough.’”
Of
course, as usually happens, like when a pastor who condemns “Gay Marriage” as bestiality
or pedophilia gets caught with children and chickens, it was only a day after
he claimed,
“We
know coronavirus will go to West Virginia sooner or later… but isn’t it strange
that the state that voted Trump in by 68%, the biggest state that voted in him,
has no virus,”
that
West Virginia announced its first case of Covid 19, admitting that it is believed
that the only reason it has taken this long for West Virginia to report a case
is due to lack of testing, not because they voted for Trump, or, perhaps, hate “The
Gays”. Only 84 tests had been given in the state, and when things got organized
with increased testing,
Senator
Joe Manchin pointed out,
“I
have over 720,000 elderly. I’ve got over 220,000 that are critically ill under
60 years of age. If you put all this together, of the 1,800,000 people, I have
over a million that could be absolutely, totally devastated by this virus if it
hits.”
But,
I digress.
Representative Louie Gohmert of Texas, when on a
conference call talking about gun control and a proposal to limit the amount of
ammunition that a person can buy at any given time, suddenly veered off on what
he thought was a reasonable comparison.
“It’s kind of like marriage when you say it’s
not a man and a woman anymore. Then why not have three men and one woman, or
four women and one man, or why not somebody has a love for an animal? There is
no clear place to draw the line once you eliminate the traditional marriage.
And it’s the same once you start putting limits on what guns can be used then
it’s just really easy to have laws that make them all illegal.”
The
effectiveness of the bestiality obsession became obviously impotent as after 16
years of marriage equality in Massachusetts and five years nationally, the tsunami
of bestiality never materialized. A perfectly good weapon like this bestiality
thing, in the eyes of some, was languishing and might be useful in another area,
and that area has been found.
Frank Amedia,
a
Trump-supporting right-wing pastor
has asserted that a vote for Joe Biden is a vote for “animalism” where “somebody
can marry a cow and have perverse sex with them.”
What is the
2020 election about?
“This is about same-sex
marriage not being approved and blessed in this country. This is not about us
changing genders into five and six meanings now. Even sexual preference has all
of a sudden been changed in the dictionary to where it’s offensive. How far do
they want us to go? Wait until animalism becomes acceptable and somebody can
marry a cow and have perverse sex with them. You think I’m laughing. That’s
what’s going to come.”
Nowhere in any of this do these objectors deal with a
marriage being a public statement of love and commitment between two consenting
adults, the word “consenting” automatically ruling out children and animals.
For some reason, however, the bestiality thing just
will not die, it just gets moved over to some other issue.
What is Christianity’s obsession with sex with animals?
When Rudi Giuliani attempted to defend himself against
the hotel room scene in the latest Borat film, as innocent as he might actually
be, it’s possible, part of his defense revealed the underlying reason men have
a problem with Transgender people. It is not about “changing” genders,
“feeling” like a woman one day and a man the next, or the simple “ick” reaction
men have to things they find odd and not for them. It is about protecting
masculinity, and, as is often the case, the defense gets stronger as a man’s
masculinity’s weaknesses are exposed.
Deflecting from his actions as he lie on the bed in
the hotel room where he has just been told by Borat who has just burst into the
room to tell him that the girl he is with is only 15 years old, unable defend
his situation, Rudi sought a distraction, and one that would win the guys over
to his side by comparing his actions with something far worse, a man who isn’t as
manly as Rudy believes himself to be.
While offering nothing by way of explanation to
justify his defense Giuliani claimed,
“This guy
comes running in, wearing a crazy, what I would say was a pink transgender
outfit.”
What in Gay hell is a
‘Transgender outfit”?
And there is the crux
of the masculine objection to the existence of Transgender people.
A man in feminine
clothes is a man in feminine clothes. That would be Cross-dressing, or
transvestitism, men, many married, heterosexual and who find women’s clothing
comfortable, shop for outfits with their wives, and dress in women’s clothing
for certain occasions. But, again, they are men who remain men and who accept
themselves as men when dressed as a woman.
A Transgender woman
would be a woman wearing a dress.
This was a situation
where to deflect by comparison of degrees of objectionable, Rudi went for the,
yeah, my action was bad, but his was worse, so I am innocent ploy.
By the way, Rudi
knows the difference between Transgender and Transvestite as he has dressed
like a woman in the past with no problem and in pictures with Trump.
Besides using
Transgender people as weapons and not bothering to learn what being Transgender
is really all about because that takes a little mental work, Rudi revealed the
guy problem of not knowing and refusing to learn that Transgender is not
limited to people aligning their physical being with their true feminine
selves, but it also includes people aligning there physical being with their
true, masculine selves.
If Borat had entered
the room in a football uniform, Rudi could have just as easily claimed he came
in wearing a “Transgender outfit”.
But that would be
acknowledging reality that is not scary enough for Giuliani’s purposes. He was
appealing to men, like himself, whose weak masculinity is easily threatened if
not worshipped.
Looking at
Homosexuals, both male and female, who in the past were executed for “crimes
against nature”, one fact, thou7gh obvious, is often overlooked because looking
takes work.
Hence, levitra 100mg pills if you are a hunter, you will know how important such accessories are. The current treatments available for schizophrenia are medication; education about the disease; individual, group, acquisition de viagra or family therapy; hospitalization; support groups; vocational programs; day-treatments; and residential programs. Interesting enough, the male online cialis sale libido can be stimulated based on the timing of day. They have not been authorized by the medical experts of Food & Drug Association (FDA) which helps for the elimination of tadalafil no prescription the troubles of male impotency that is suffered by countless number of males who have been experiencing difficulties during the sessions of making love.
The general practice
was that, caught in flagrante delicto, that means “doing it”, although both
parties might have been arrested, both were not executed.
In the case of men it
would be the one “receiving” person, as he had surrendered his masculinity by
taking on the role of the woman, and with Lesbians it was the one doing the
penetrating because she had the effrontery to assume the masculine role.
It was not that the
two people of the same sex having intercourse, but that the male role was either
relinquished or assumed.
It was not the act
itself. It was not Homosexuality that was the crime. The crime was a man giving
up his superior, God-given role, and a woman assuming it.
I was a male-centric
situation.
That is one reason
why, when speaking about Transgender people, those uninformed who express their
uninformed opinions limit their rejection and the examples to justify it cite only
men dressing as women because by doing that they defend their own masculinity
by proxy.
To consider the other
half of the equation, a woman dressed as a man, in the terms of their
acceptance of the rejected reality, must be avoided as in the former case the
claim is the need to protect the weak, while in the latter it would call for
accepting that males can be threatened by women dressed as men.
They are the real men
because they object to men not being “manly”
With Gay men, they
concentrate on the “Flaming Queen” because that is obviously a ceding of one’s
masculinity while they ignore the vast majority of Gay men who are not as
visible because they do not threaten the male image.
With the program
“Will and Grace”, critics and self-appointed morality cops, like the late Jerry
falwell claimed that Will was not a true representative of Gay men because he
acted masculinely, had a good job, and seemed well adjusted, while Jack was
truly Gay because he was flighty, somewhat confused, and didn’t hold down a
manly job, oh, and he swished.
The real problem men have with Transgender people isn’t with the reality of them since those who reject them don it as they steadfastly refuse to learn, but with its being, to them, an attack on masculinity and their own comfort in their own sexuality.
Men, guys, let’s be honest.
When it comes to this whole Transgender thing, it’s
just a bit much, and, come on, besides because, well, guys.
There is something not guy about it.
And that is the beginning and end of the whole thing.
This is what keeps us from learning. This is what traps us in an ignorance that
is below our dignity. It’s not easy being a guy. We carry the weight of the
world and the responsibility for it on our backs, and on our shoulders we carry
family, work, and the good ol’ U.S. of A.
So, this makes us uneasy.
We don’t get it, so there has to be something wrong with it.
Over 500 children who had been taken from their parents upon reaching our Southern Border because of the Trump administration’s policy that called for that as a deterrent by example, are now unable to be reunited with their parents, some of whom have been deported without them, some who, having gotten their child away from the dangers they were fleeing, chose to leave their kid rather than take them back to that danger, and those who fell victim to a failed system that seemed to ignore the reality that if you intend to temporarily remove children from their parents, before doing that, it might be good to establish a system so you can reunite them.
These children, whose lives have been forever altered in a rather horrific way, will grow up dealing with the trauma. Their parents will have to deal with the loss of a child they know is alive, but whom they will never see again and will never get to watch grow to have families of their own. Some of the children are so young, they will have few if any fuzzy memories of people they might vaguely remember while hating them for bringing them to a foreign country, dumping them there, and then running off.
At the debate Trump was given an
opportunity to show empathy.
He cannot deny that whether or not the practice went as it should have with the results being as wanted, the child separation policy, when put into practice, did not work on many levels, and, like Biden did when he admitted the Obama administration may not have acted fast enough on criminal justice reform, taking responsibility, Trump, could have simply admitted that there are flaws that need to be seriously addressed. Instead, he took the moment as an opportunity to defend himself by ignoring the psychological effects of being separated from your parents, and telling us,
“They are so well taken care of. They’re
in facilities that were so clean.”
What kids need their parents when they get to sleep on concrete floors, wrapped in Mylar blankets, inside chain link fence enclosures, with no idea what happened to your parents.