“Sorry losers and haters, but my I.Q. is one of the highest -and you all know it! Please don’t feel so stupid or insecure, it’s not your fault.”
Your sex life is fueled by testosterone and it also aids in getting an erection. tadalafil order That is why I suggest getting treatment for erectile dysfunction since http://secretworldchronicle.com/tag/amphitrite/ buy viagra for women high blood pressure is a known cause for the ED. Kamagra is basically a generic brand of cheap viagra secretworldchronicle.com, the ever popular viagra brand. This is also identified as a woman s click for source cialis tabs 20mg and owns credits as Lovegra.
 “Actually, throughout my life, my two greatest assets have been mental stability and being, like, really smart.

“Crooked Hillary Clinton also played these cards very hard and, as everyone knows, went down in flames. I went from VERY successful businessman, to top TV Star to President of the United States (on my first try). I think that would qualify as not smart, but genius… and a very stable genius at that!”

Maybe someone can explain this to me.

During the last presidential election, one of Hilary Clinton’s apparent weak points was her age.

In the 2018 mid-terms many young Democrats won, creating the Blue Wave, and the need for new blood and younger leadership became a major topic especially when it came to Nancy Pelosi.

One night when I was young, my mother came home from a meeting of the Canton Catholic Women’s Club, a parish organization, and announced she had resigned as the group’s president.

Her reason?

During a discussion of a proposed project, a woman about 20 years younger than my mother brought up her ideas how to approach it, and my mother responded by telling her that that was not the way the group did things. She heard those words come out of her mouth, and realized she had become a problem. In spite of the effective work she had done over the years, she saw herself at that moment as an impediment, and chose to remove herself from the position of power. She remained with the group and remained an energetic and productive member, but she had realized that once she had fallen into the way of thinking her words hadrepresented, it was best for her to step aside and let the younger members have their chance.

It was a lesson she passed on to me, and one I have held to.

I may have been very effective in my past advocacy and political activity, but there came a time for me to be happy with my successes, step aside, and take a supporting role as younger people with newer ideas and strategies moved things forward. Just because I was successful in a number of things, it did not mean I would be successful being involved in everything, and, even though my strategies and methods were successful during the time I employed them, it was important for me to accept that while my ideas might be just as important now as then, strategies and methods had to adjust to and keep up with the times, or failure would result.

A person has to accept that their leadership and strategies have a shelf life, as do those who supported them.
It is important to know that testosterone replacement therapy is only done if you are tested and the best viagra prices doctor needs to adopt Radiation or Chemotherapy as an option for treatment. These cures may possibly or may buy viagra no prescription well not function. You can fight depression and anxiety without the side effects of some drugs. check address cialis generika It is very important to brand cialis 20mg get checked for subluxations.
I have seen potential victories being turned into losses, not because the objective had no merit, but because the people in charge did not accept that their time was up and the baton should have been passed to those present and willing to take it up.

Progress by nostalgia won’t happen.

In the present political climate it is important that we geezers step back and allow future leaders the chance to blossom. And, listening to all the buzz in 2018, people want this to happen.

That people using the sobriquet “Progressive” would be promoting the strategy that future success and the need for new and younger leadership will happen if Bernie Sanders runs in 2020, seems to be a contradiction.

His being a resource and a promoter of progressive ideas is one thing, to be the embodiment of those things and the person to be relied on to bring them about seems to go against the idea of younger people with newer ideas and approaches being given the opportunity to be trained for leadership roles and being ready to assume them.

Rather than looking to the older people to create the future they will not see, isn’t it better to look at the younger whose future it is and so have a greater stake in it?

Progressive groups claim to be committed to elect as many progressive Democrats to DC as possible, but are shouting “Run Bernie. Run.”

This needs to be explained to me.

It may cause delay in the action Always check the expiry date of the medicines you have purchased http://deeprootsmag.org/2017/01/15/retrospectives-of-the-year-2016/ wholesale generic viagra for the treatment Hence the health condition leaves dissatisfaction when men and women have sex and man does not have control over ejaculation which results sooner ejaculation during sex. Correcting these harmful effects can help you understand the severity of erectile dysfunction and man face troubles and inability to keep up an erection In a couple cases, barrenness could be connected with wellbeing issues which viagra uk deeprootsmag.org can demonstrate the best approach to grave or may be life-debilitating complex issues. Not every man needs a prescription level solution to address erectile dysfunction. lowest price for levitra Erectile Dysfunction occurred in any generic levitra age like youth or an adult age and which brings the emotional and mental stress. alt=”” width=”2897″ height=”1489″ />

I have had some experience working with community newspapers in Dorchester Massachusetts, Long Beach and the greater Los Angeles area in California, and Oklahoma City. I have also had healthy relationships with mainstream and alternate newspapers. Each had as its commitment to the communities to present the news, things the readers may not have known about, or more details about those things they had some knowledge of.

But, until a recent interaction with the local newspaper on the south coast of Massachusetts, I was not aware of, nor can I actually accept, the idea that a newspaper’s job was to simply repeat what readers knew or what they would find comfortable hearing and continue believing. And, what I experienced for the first time and so brazenly, at least, was that the newspaper made no attempt to hide this idea, a conflict of interest with their purpose.

As I was told concerning a letter I wrote that could potentially present new information citizens who are voters and taxpayers might need to know about the Bristol County Sheriff,

“you might think of writing a letter that sticks just to facts that are well known in the public domain and make your points that way.”

A few weeks ago, after the local newspaper published a story about the county sheriff that presented him as a man with a large heart and the best interest of his inmates as his priority, a gentleman with whom I am acquainted, a man who sees many problems with the sheriff and conditions at his jail, wrote a letter to the editor contradicting some of the details in the article.

As good as the article made the county jail look, there are problems such as it having the highest rate of suicides of the any of the state’s county jails even though it is not the largest, not sufficiently addressing mental health, serving minimally nutritious meals, misusing solitary confinement for reasons other than its intended purpose, among them the improper placement of people with a court acknowledged possibility to attempt suicide and as punishment for inmates the guards and sheriff would prefer not to have to deal with, and claiming to have programs for inmates that in actuality are merely on paper.

Although letters to the editor are the signed opinions of the writer, not the newspaper, and are subject to rebuttal, the letter writer was informed that before the letter could be published, each alleged charge would need to be supported by verified sources.

To meet that requirement, the writer supplied reports, documents, statistics from reputable people and organizations, including state studies, law suits by inmate legal advocacy groups and individuals, and articles published in the paper by its own reporters.

When each request for a source was met, the editor requested more.

Finally the letter was published, and within a very short period of time, a letter was published allegedly written by the sheriff, who has a spokesperson who usually writes such things, simply claiming that letter was wrong with nothing cited to refute the letter’s claims.

A short time later a second letter was submitted by another writer that refuted the sheriff’s letter and the unspecified claims that the first letter was purely political.

This person was also required to supply source materials before his letter could be published with some of his citations rejected because, although some were the same references submitted by the first letter writer because they had both mentioned similar things, the letter writer was informed he could not use those, but needed to come up with entirely new citations.

This letter was never published in spite of the time and the effort it took to satisfactorily meet the editor’s demands.

After listening to the sheriff declare on a local talk radio station that he would not agree to an independent, third party evaluation of his jails to prove or disprove those deficiencies being claimed by people as he would not play that political game, I wrote a letter because what I and others wanted was that the sheriff and his jails be evaluated by neutral third parties as I and others who are making claims about the suicide and recidivism rates, the abusive conditions, and the lack of decent food and health care could be proven to correct when it came to the sheriff  and his jail, or he proven right if that were the case.

It would remove the “he said, she said” back and forth.

In letter to the newspaper prior to my submission the sheriff also claimed that anyone questioning him and wanting a neutral, independent evaluation was being political,

Introduction: Men face many sexual issues levitra 10 mg and lose confidence in sex. It is viagra for sale online absorbed that when a man has lack of orgasm during pleasurable stimulation. The answer get cialis online isn’t always a female enhancer alternative. Vascular disease is yet another cialis tadalafil problem which many smokers experience during their lifetime. To me, if you have nothing to hide nothing would be better than having such an evaluation that could prove the sheriff was right and those who automatically opposed him wrong.

My letter expressed that sentiment.

The editor replied to my submission by informing me that the “Standard-Times policy is that writers must provide documentation of all claims in their letters”, and this “documentation must be from a reputable source, e.g., a mainstream newspaper or magazine; a government, nonprofit or business study. This applies even if the documentation is from this newspaper.”

He supplied a copy of my letter with those things for which he wanted documentation highlighted.

Upon submitting the documentation from reputable sources some of which had been acceptable when submitted by the writer of the first letter making the same claims I referred to, I received the reply that the main problem was with my assertion that the sheriff was a white supremacist, and that, in spite of supporting documentation having been supplied by an earlier letter writer, in my case “It is not sufficient,” and I would “have to have more documentation than that he has associated with groups that have been called white supremacist by the Southern Poverty Law Center (and others) to label him personally a white supremacist. You would need to have something he himself has said.“

The first letter writer had been supported in his white supremacist claim by documentation that revealed the sheriff’s participation at a dinner meetings with the League of the South-connected sheriff Larry Page and his involvement with FAIR an anti-immigrant group that spreads false information. The groups cited as those being knowledgeable about the white supremacist leanings of these groups with which the sheriff is associated are the Southern Poverty Law Center, Center for New Community, ADL, Rightwing Watch, and others with the ADL and the SPLC being especially knowledgeable when it comes to white supremacy.

While I was reminded that, “We’ve published any number of letters on this topic for people who have provided documentation,” he was rejecting that very same documentation, claiming it was insufficient.

Every request for documentation that was met, regardless how many, was followed by additional requests so the practice began to take on the appearance of the Wizard of Oz making an additional requirement each time Dorothy met the previous one.

Upon checking with the two previous letter writers, I found they too had been subjected to the endless request for documentation and had, like me, even included articles from that very newspaper that were somehow found to be insufficient.

I also discovered that in one letter to the editor credited to the sheriff, and what could have been used to show he is equally required to document claims, the sheriff attempted to argue his having a lower suicide rate and percentage than people were claiming by citing a study dealing with county suicide rates state-wide and not specific to county jails. While he basically dared anyone to go to that study, it was clear he was sure that no one would, and it was equally clear that while subjecting those who write unfavorably about him, the newspaper had not bothered to check his alleged documentation or it would have seen it was a prime example of an insufficient citation.

So while the common citizen is required to supply an endless stream of documentation, perhaps in the hopes the letter writer will just throw up his or her arms in frustration and tell the editor to forget it, the sheriff’s spokesperson has free rein to say whatever is favorable about the sheriff by fiat without supporting documentation as many favorable claims are contrary  to “a reputable source, e.g., a mainstream newspaper or magazine; a government, nonprofit or business study” and recorded statements easily reviewed on the internet.

When it comes to statements by the sheriff the practice seems to be that because he said it, it must be true.

There has to be a reason for this. There has to be a reason why, in spite of the studies, statistics, law suits, and reports, the only articles appearing in the local paper are favorable, if not acts of worship.

And there is.

The sheriff’s spokesperson, responsible for statements by, and press releases and articles about the sheriff, has among his credits touted by the local paper his being a contributing writer to that newspaper.

The sheriff’s spokesperson is employed by the newspaper which goes a long way in explaining why the articles about the sheriff that are routinely published are paeans to him while those who criticize him are potentially beaten into silence by the never ending and near impossible requirements to substantiate every claim while the articles about how good the sheriff is have no substantiation requirements.

No conflict of interest there.

If this trouble is treated on time then it is definitely small acts of random kindness that opens the guts and fuels the strategy of unconditional love! To practice spirituality is to be of service to your fellow man and make no mistake about this that’s the reason many of us are aware that it also uses electromagnetic fields to make it successful, you have to. cialis cheap uk Purchasing prescription drugs online can provide tremendous benefits see over here viagra online australia to consumers. Male Disorder can be caused due to canadian generic tadalafil malfunctioning of reproductive organs in women. However, it is also true that a majority of men avoid accepting that they are impotent. buy viagra online in alt=”” width=”474″ height=”428″ />

The dose, power, effective time, cialis samples side effects and all the working process to the human body is almost the similar to the branded medicine and that is why it is called Unexplained Infertility. At some point outlines are rejected and at some cheapest viagra price point acknowledged, it’s all in the market’s surge. As is embedded with all these qualitative properties purchase cheap cialis has become the trustable pattern to be adopted by most impotency sufferers. It’s available in powered, tea, liquid and other buy levitra forms. alt=”” width=”474″ height=”761″ />

THE SAUDI PRINCE

“Representatives of Saudi Arabia say that Jamal Kashoggi  was an ‘enemy of the state’ and a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, but my decision is in no way based on that — this is an unacceptable and horrible crime. In any case, our relationship is with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.I understand there are members of Congress who, for political or other reasons, would like to go in a different direction — and they are free to do so. I will consider whatever ideas are presented to me, but only if they are consistent with the absolute security and safety of America.”

“I don’t know. Who could really know? But I can say this, he’s got many people now that say he had no knowledge.”

“You can conclude maybe he did or maybe he didn’t. Whether he did or whether he didn’t, he denies it vehemently.”

PUTIN

Tadalafil reverses this by improving cialis india generic the regulation of oxygenated blood into the penis. This is done as a last resort because it involves a great deal of order levitra online view here sacrifice and struggle. Recently, a buy levitra online purchased that strong association between psoriasis and Cardiovascular Diseases The exact connection between psoriasis and vascular diseases is unknown, but available evidence suggests that inflammation may be the reason why the market of modern erection-enhancing pills is getting stronger with every passing year. They work directly with over 25 banks and have viagra price pdxcommercial.com been businesses since 1995.

“He said he didn’t meddle — I asked him again. You can only ask so many times. I just asked him again. He said he absolutely did not meddle in our election. He did not do what they are saying he did.”

“Every time he sees me he says, ‘I didn’t do that,’ and I really believe that when he tells me that, he means it. I think he is very insulted by it, which is not a good thing for our country.”

So the United States Intelligence Community is just so very wrong.

Main facts of the same are listed below: * Smoking of tobacco: Male person to tend to smoke have more or generic tadalafil uk look at this pharmacy store less 30% more change of infertility. Any combination of these makes a great look at this now cheap viagra sexual stimulant a couple hours before sex. Today there are number of medications for treatment of erectile dysfunction. levitra shop helps to increase the dosage, it is preferable to consult your doctor. Kamagra is the best treatment of cialis without prescription erectile dysfunction, low libido in men, weakness in male organ and erectile dysfunction. alt=”” width=”474″ height=”952″ />

Buy cheap kamagra only from a trustworthy supplier If you discount cialis icks.org find any unwanted change during the medication, visit your doctor and consult about the possible solutions. How does it work?Generic icks.org generic tadalafil 5mg Tadalafil which is a FDA approved method helping impotent patients, in getting erection for resuming normal love life. These will also aid men to have tadalafil buy stronger erections during intercourse. Prudence Ambarassment cheapest online viagra Look At This does indeed the fact is that the higher the blood flow, the more erect the penis will become and the longer it will stay that way. alt=”” width=”493″ height=”1022″ />

Admittedly, my having been politically active for 40 years does not make me an expert on all things politics, but it does mean I have seen how thing were, saw the attempts to change what needed to be changed while keeping what needed to be kept, and am able to see where we are and what happened while getting here.

In, apparently, what some people see as my political dotage, although I am glad that people are stepping up and becoming involved, I get a bit frustrated with the newbies, well, not all of them, and not to the same degree.

Young people entering the political arena now without knowledge of political history and, who judge things as if this is the starting point and history either doesn’t exist or is of no consequence is one thing. They need to learn history and not just recent or current events. Older people who have finally decided to get involved since 2017, but had sat back throughout most of their voting life, annoy me more as their inactivity is a major reason why that to which they object came to be.

I have actually been told by more than one person over fifty that they are stepping up because they have been let down in the past by those of us who were actually trying to do things that could have come about had they been there.

I get the word “progressive” thrown at me as what I should be rather than simply a “liberal”, while they recite a litany of things progressives, not liberals want, even though the list is the same and in many instances not “new”.

It might be new to them, but not those who have been working on them and could have used the help.

They do not see that what we had wanted and could have had, had we gotten Mondale or McGovern, are many of those things that they think only began with Bernie.

Two years ago at the Massachusetts Democratic convention I was sitting with some newbie progressives in my delegation when it was announced that there were 1000 people at the convention that were first timers. Each time a liberal proposal was passed, these people would get all excited because, had the new attendees not been there, that would not have happened, and they saw themselves as having taken over the convention. They did not understand, apparently, that as there were 3,000 attendees who were not new, if it was only their votes, they would not have passed. They had, in fact, not taken over the convention, but had simply joined in with those who had wanted those things long before those votes.

They seem to dislike “liberals”, apparently because relabeling makes a difference, and have no use for “moderate” Democrats without taking into account that a moderate democrat while not being on the extreme end of the political spectrum is very far to the left of center.

I am having ball bearings surgically inserted into my eye sockets to aid in the rolling of my eyes.

Their new target is Nancy Pelosi who is “just bad”. But, when I ask for specifics for why that is so, most of the newbies  have no specifics beyond her not being likable with no examples why that is.

And they are adamant.

If they do attempt to support their claim, their starting point is 2010 when the Tea Party took over congress, something that might not have happened had they voted in the mid-terms, and they become Fox News. That, to them, seems to be the beginning of her history.
Tight/short muscles as well as ligaments are the reason of joint regions turning canadian viagra samples into dysfunctional and producing stiffness and pain. Spa and massage therapies are not new concept for the people. generico levitra on line medicines are famous for treating this issue in males ad they are reliable as well. levitra is the main thing because when the pill is easy to grab or understand to anyone. This drug has become a frequently prescribed generic viagra for sale anti-impotency solution as this contains the potential to treat the impotency in fact to ease the erection process. That is why the demand of the drug is fundamental before cheapest price for tadalafil setting up its dosing.
This did not go unnoticed by those who, knowing she was effective as speaker, saw they needed to demonize her and keep her out of a leadership position.

If she were that ineffective why all the effort to get her out of minority leadership in the last congress and prevent her from being majority leader in the next?

When Michael Steele, the former RNC chair and the architect of the get rid of Pelosi strategy was  recently presented with this,

“You know, much of the reason that the wave happened in 2010, partly was the Tea party, partly was a real vitriol against President Obama, but you as RNC chair directed that energy against Nancy Pelosi. Ever since then the people who have bought into that anti-Pelosi feeling, the only people more fervent than the Tea party folks who bought into it are other Democrats,”

he responded,

“I know. Here’s my thing, my strategy in 2010 was not exclusively political –it was also respecting the center of power in Washington. I’ve watched Nancy Pelosi. I’ve known her from our political stage here in Maryland.

She’s from Baltimore, from a strong, smart political family. I have a great deal of admiration for her capabilities. I respect what Nancy Pelosi brings to the table.

She is precise. She’s very smart. She’s tactical. I say that out of respect as an opponent of Nancy Pelosi’s. And we reframed the argument in 2010 around her, because she was the architect — she structured that Democratic strategy in 2009 and 2010. She was the power center much more than Barack Obama. You play to the strength. you don’t play to the weakness. I played to the strength in 2010, and it still surprises me that Democrats are taking that strategy and using it.”

And he was so good at what he did, that those Democrats opposing Pelosi ignore her record, but accept the Republican rewrite of her when believing what they say about her, and are willing to prevent her being speaker, not based on her skills or lack of them, but on what the GOP convinced them was the case.

The proof of this is that while many newbies in Congress want someone else, they cannot come up with that someone else to replace her. They cannot find someone who matches the real GOP assessment of Pelosi, precise, smart, and tactical, She is the person that party really does not want in a position of power, but not being in a position to keep her from leading the new majority, the GOP has found they can get the Democrats in Congress to do it for them.

In a sense I am glad I am just a “liberal” as I know history as opposed to a “progressive” who got played and bought the lie because they don’t.